FSX content taxonomy

[PhilTaylor]

after several rounds of discussions on various forums over how to label FSX content, I developed a FSX content taxonomy to more fully describe the problem.

this description can be found here:
http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/archive/2 ... onomy.aspx

I hope people find it useful.

[BFMF]

I like your idea.... :)

An old outdated FS9 aircraft shouldn't be labeled 'FSX Certified', especially if it's a payware aircraft. That's false advertisement...



#$%&*@! Carenado.... >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(

[Microsoft Corporation]

I've only bought one payware AC for FSX which is the Airbus Collection and I regret it.  That $35 would have been better spent on a FSX SDK AC.    

[macca22au]

There is really some excellent payware for FSX, so I'm sorry that your experience has been bad.  The wilco airbus 1 & 2 are better, but there are many many others large and small that are demanding and fun.

[BFMF]

I don't doubt that there are good payware addons for FSX/SP2, but a lot of FSX addons don't say if they're specifically for FSX/SP2, or somewhat compatible with FSX.

That's why i'm hesitent. Saying it's 'FSX Certified' is vague, and doesn't mean a thing anymore