I was going to wait till you guys got finished ... I guess you figured it out
Even if it worked, putting your page file on a flash stick is never going to boost anything.
First of all,
The flash memory can not be read or written faster than a hard drive, at least not in this day and age. Solid state hard drives are now becoming of age and you can get a 76GB for about 3000 bucks that will run 2X faster than any mechanical drive off the SATA or IDE. USB sticks are currently limited to the technology of the stick, not the port. The port can handle the speed, the stick can't. You would be better off on a USB external hard drive with such methods... even though moving the Windows page file is not going to net you any speed. It may even slow you down.
Second,
The process being used in Vista has success because the OS is designed to allocate the resources and use them with the feature. Even so, anyone using a USB flash drive for memory in Vista, unless you are just plain desperate, is getting some success but it is very limited and most likely psychosomatic although if the system is running 1 gig or less with FSX I can see where having a bit more available will help. As flash stick speeds get better that feature in Vista may have real benefit but for the cost of real memory sticks as compared to the cost of state of the art flash sticks, I think it