I dont like the fact that MS decides what someone should be able to due with thier own computer, but do like the fact that they realize the riskes that some third party companies give a unsuspecting user.
Most computers pre-built come with the bloatware known as Norton or McAfee (this is also how they get thier ranks as being "most used"). The only times I had serious issues was when running one of the above products then turned to freeware solutions such as AVG or Avast and haven't had a issue since. Recently I have went back to payware and got NOD32 and must say that it is the absolute best there is.
I feel that Bill has the right to make his product anyway he chooses, just like the computer user has the right to buy it. Just becasue 80% of the computers in the world run Windows is the reason third parties are pissed if they arent allowed to "infect" peoples computers it will be a huge loss for them, but America in general is based on free enterprise and if the third parties cant except that too bad.
Maybe if they would think about re-doing thier software to be less bloated and more efficient then MS may reconsider.
I am however watching this closely to see what the outcome will be.
Microsoft is locking security firms - and other software developers - out of the core in an effort to prevent kernel attacks on Vista.
That right there makes perfect sense to me
