When you stretch the FSX configuration with special software over three monitors, a third of the presentation is absorbed by each 1680 x 1050 monitor. This of course gives you a greatly improved field of vision laterally. However, what you see in resolution is three separate monitors each displaying a resolution of 1680 x 1050. Although the total adds up to 5040 x 1050, you are only seeing 1680 x 1050.
When you stretch the FSX configuration with special software over three monitors, a third of the presentation is absorbed by each 1680 x 1050 monitor. This of course gives you a greatly improved field of vision laterally. However, what you see in resolution is three separate monitors each displaying a resolution of 1680 x 1050. Although the total adds up to 5040 x 1050, you are only seeing 1680 x 1050.
Finally, You made the statement that you have been using the term "resolution" to refer to total pixel dimentions, regardless of pixel density and which you think is the common usage. You are entitled to your opinion, but I must tell you based on my past experience and the amount of research done prior to my last three posts, I did not find this to be the case.
Finally, You made the statement that you have been using the term "resolution" to refer to total pixel dimentions, regardless of pixel density and which you think is the common usage. You are entitled to your opinion, but I must tell you based on my past experience and the amount of research done prior to my last three posts, I did not find this to be the case.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 218 guests