by ctjoyce » Tue Dec 26, 2006 9:31 pm
sorry but u deserve a
LOL
its not crap it does brilliantly for a year old card, but put against a 8800GTX its gonna look bad isnt it you fool
personaly i would rather have that than my 7900GTO
and also, it has 1 less FPS than both the 8800GT's and its a DX9 card and has 1 differant setting. hmm such a crap card isnt it!
you are saying the same statment over and over, but no proof! I want you to check out this link, and then talk about ATI for FSX...
http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.h ... h1c2lhc3Q=
No offence but its time for you to shut up until you understand the differnces in core archatextures.
There are some major differences between the R580 and G80 cores of ATi and nVidia. Yes the first most noted one being DX10 and Pixel shader model 4 going to the G80. However when we read deeper into the differenes in the cores we find that due to the new Pixel shader model the way that the G80 renders AA and AF is far superior to that of the R580. Read up on this
http://anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2870&p=1 to fully understand the sheer magnitude of the card.
Now I am not going to debate that there are some serious issues to be resolved with the X1950 however in real world testing we have found that the 8800GTX in SLi is actually slower than 7900GTX in SLi, and usually all they offer are more eye candy. Which yes smoother lines on the wings are nice, currently the 8800GTX has no benchmark to win itself over a X1950XTX, infact in most FPS contests the X1950XTX wins.
Cheers
Cameron
CTJoyce, Modding and voiding warranties since 2003
Sheila's Specs:ASUS Striker Extreme 680i, Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2Ghz, Corsair XMS2 PC2-6400C4 2GB, 2x eVGA 7900GT KO, Western Digital 80GB SATA & 250GB SATAIII
[b]Vesp