by congo » Sun Mar 12, 2006 4:57 am
Just google up the info, there is plenty written about raid array types, but basically, RAID 0 is 2 drives for near double speed with no redundancy, RAID 1 is 2 drives with slower speed and full redundancy. O + 1 is a combo of the two, can't remember what the others are offhand.
2 x 250gb HDD's in Raid 0 gives a total of 500gb data storage, where the same two drives in RAID 1 gives 250gb data storage. You get redundancy with RAID 1 at a speed and capacity penalty.
Gamers are interested in RAID 0, for fast disk access.
The risk of RAID? You mean RAID 0, where if one drive fails you lose all data on the array.
Well, the same can be said for any hard disk setup. If you use 2 drives in RAID 0, it just means there are now two drives that could possibly fail, not just one.
Did this logic ever stop anyone from buying two RAM sticks ? Mind you, you won't lose your data if ram fails, but what I'm trying to say is...... if your data is that important, you should be using a redundant RAID 1 in the first place where two copies of your data are always present. A single drive can fail and you will lose your data. A Raid 0 Array will fail if a single drive in the array fails. If a drive fails in a RAID 1 array, the array can be rebuilt from the remaining drive.
How risk is measured is very personal unless the machine is used for some public task.
I recently set up my first RAID 0 on this PC, it's fast. I should have done it years ago.
Damn the torpedoes..... Full speed ahead!
Last edited by
congo on Sun Mar 12, 2006 5:14 am, edited 1 time in total.

Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24&