Athalon vs. Intel

Graphics Cards, Sound Cards, Joysticks, Computers, etc. Ask or advise here!

Re: Athalon vs. Intel

Postby Delta_ » Thu Dec 18, 2003 10:32 am

That is truly mad,
they are about
Last edited by Delta_ on Thu Dec 18, 2003 10:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Delta_
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1919
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 6:40 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Athalon vs. Intel

Postby 4_Series_Scania » Fri Dec 19, 2003 2:54 pm

I had an utterly naff 1.7 Celeron, it ran most things well except CFS3
Last edited by 4_Series_Scania on Fri Dec 19, 2003 2:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Posting drivel here since Jan 31st, 2002. - That long!
"He who laughs last, thinks slowest."
User avatar
4_Series_Scania
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3194
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 4:34 pm
Location: Newport Shropshire U.K.

Re: Athalon vs. Intel

Postby Ivan » Sat Dec 20, 2003 1:07 pm

Tech rant ahead...

Pentium is faster memory wise
AMD is faster in floating point

AMD Athlon is nearly the same as the famous DEC Alpha if you talk about bus protocol. There is a certain AMD-built server chipset that can be set to DEC Alpha mode, just by changing the processor socket (not a user mod)
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

Re: Athalon vs. Intel

Postby Dan » Sun Dec 21, 2003 10:38 am

Tech rant ahead...
Was that it? Was that the rant? I expected more than that...
Dan G
Wales, Uk
Image
3DMark01 || [url=http://www.overclockers.co.uk/acatalog/]OCUK - The best UK shop
User avatar
Dan
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1712
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 9:37 am
Location: Carmarthenshire, Wales, Uk!

Re: Athalon vs. Intel

Postby 4_Series_Scania » Sun Dec 21, 2003 6:08 pm

Was that it? Was that the rant? I expected more than that...
Dan G
Wales, Uk


;D
Posting drivel here since Jan 31st, 2002. - That long!
"He who laughs last, thinks slowest."
User avatar
4_Series_Scania
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3194
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 4:34 pm
Location: Newport Shropshire U.K.

Re: Athalon vs. Intel

Postby richardd43 » Mon Dec 29, 2003 4:43 am

Buy an AMD 2500+ Barton and set the FSB at 200. You effectively have a AMD 3200 for half the price
Asus P8Z77-V Deluxe
Intel I7 3770K w/ Corsair H100
Thermaltake Level 10 GT
Silverstone 1000W PSU
User avatar
richardd43
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 764
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 4:31 am
Location: Edmonton AB

Re: Athalon vs. Intel

Postby boo_a_carab » Mon Dec 29, 2003 3:08 pm

To me it's odd that Intel is the most advertised and sought after processor and yet studies show that AMD with quanti-speed architecture is actually much faster.
32 bit and 64 bit. 64 bit requires a whole different setup than what I have. I am happy with my my AMD processor although I need to up it a little to enjoy the full possibilities of FS 04.

P.S. This is not a flame
System specs:
Gigabyte 7NNXP Motherboard
AMD Athlon XP Mobile 2600+ CPU OCed @ 2400MHz, liquid cooled
Gigabyte 6800GT AGP Stock settings
1,536MB, 400MHz, Geil, duel channel, RAM
Duel WD Raptors in RAID0
560w Thermaltake PSU
User avatar
boo_a_carab
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Athalon vs. Intel

Postby daveyboy » Tue Dec 30, 2003 5:43 am

Has anyone out there actually run FS2004 on an AMD64?

My understanding is that the AMD64 would be running in its 32-bit compatibility mode (since Win and FS2004 are 32-bit apps), so you wouldn't see any increase in performance over a 32-bit Athlon processor running at the same clock speed. (If you see what I mean! :) )
In fact, I saw some benchmarks carried out on the new 64-bit chip that suggest it might even be *slower* when running 32-bit applications.

If that's the case, then anyone wishing to use their machine purely for fs2004 might do better to go for a cheaper (32-bit) Athlon or Pentium running at the same clock speed, and spend the extra cash on RAM or a better video card.

I'm currently weighing up the 64-bit/32-bit question for a new PC, so any ideas/opinions/abuse would be gratefully received...
daveyboy
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2003 6:25 am

Re: Athalon vs. Intel

Postby Dan » Tue Dec 30, 2003 1:11 pm

/abuse
 ;) LMAO
Dan
Image
3DMark01 || [url=http://www.overclockers.co.uk/acatalog/]OCUK - The best UK shop
User avatar
Dan
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1712
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 9:37 am
Location: Carmarthenshire, Wales, Uk!

Re: Athalon vs. Intel

Postby bm » Tue Dec 30, 2003 4:37 pm

Hi Daveyboy, Im afraid I don't I don't know much about computers (so don't listen!) but I have a new machine on the way (see below).

I am slightly regretting my decision not to go for the AMD64 now. I think the Pentium 4 3.2Ghz is the best short term solution (benchmarks etc prove this) but the world will be moving on to 64bit proccessors. Who can tell whether the game developement people with discard the 32bit stuff sooner or later. Hopefully it will be later from my point of view!*

*I knew I shouldn't have bought this months computer shopper (Febuary in January - the world is mad!) but I found the world of computers quite interesting! The sooner this new one arrives I can stop worrying!
bm
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1163
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 3:39 pm
Location: UK

Re: Athalon vs. Intel

Postby Dan » Wed Dec 31, 2003 7:51 am

64bit - drool
Image
3DMark01 || [url=http://www.overclockers.co.uk/acatalog/]OCUK - The best UK shop
User avatar
Dan
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1712
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 9:37 am
Location: Carmarthenshire, Wales, Uk!

Re: Athalon vs. Intel

Postby 4_Series_Scania » Thu Jan 01, 2004 12:28 pm

Hi Daveyboy, Im afraid I don't I don't know much about computers (so don't listen!) but I have a new machine on the way (see below).

I am slightly regretting my decision not to go for the AMD64 now. I think the Pentium 4 3.2Ghz is the best short term solution (benchmarks etc prove this) but the world will be moving on to 64bit proccessors. Who can tell whether the game developement people with discard the 32bit stuff sooner or later. Hopefully it will be later from my point of view!*

*I knew I shouldn't have bought this months computer shopper (Febuary in January - the world is mad!) but I found the world of computers quite interesting! The sooner this new one arrives I can stop worrying!


I think your fears are somewhat unjustified birdman,

Cast your mind back, remember the many people who rushed out to buy the then new Sct423 Pentium 4's? within months of the new platform's launch Intel went and re-designed the chip, onto a Sct 478 platform and overnight all the "new" p4's were utterly obsolete!

My advice with any new Processor range is to wait and see what revisions (i.e. bug/glitch fixes) they iron out first, wait for the new chip to settle on something representing a standard spec, then perhaps take the plunge.
Not forgetting, in this time of waiting and seeing, the price will keep falling not to mention the sound of Intel's 64Bit p5 in the distance,will be getting very loud by then . ;)
Posting drivel here since Jan 31st, 2002. - That long!
"He who laughs last, thinks slowest."
User avatar
4_Series_Scania
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3194
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 4:34 pm
Location: Newport Shropshire U.K.

Re: Athalon vs. Intel

Postby bm » Thu Jan 01, 2004 1:01 pm

Im afraid I can't cast my mind back! I am completely new to all this computer stuff! I only took an interest when this computer started messing around! I had no Idea a month or two ago what all the bits were inside! (you get the picture!)!!! (and that you could get a slow motherboard!!!)

I am getting over my goosebumps now. I realize what I read was someone from AMD scaring everybody into getting an 64bit CPU with there new computer! And he obviosly has no motive other then to direct people to do the right thing ;)

Oh well, we'll see!
Last edited by bm on Thu Jan 01, 2004 1:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
bm
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1163
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 3:39 pm
Location: UK

Re: Athalon vs. Intel

Postby 4_Series_Scania » Thu Jan 01, 2004 5:54 pm

I realize what I read was someone from AMD scaring everybody into getting an 64bit CPU with there new computer! And he obviosly has no motive other then to direct people to do the right thing ;)

Oh well, we'll see!



Welcome to the honest & truthful world of PC marketing, I advise you leave any morals or principles of fair play here at the door.

;)
;D
Posting drivel here since Jan 31st, 2002. - That long!
"He who laughs last, thinks slowest."
User avatar
4_Series_Scania
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3194
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 4:34 pm
Location: Newport Shropshire U.K.

Re: Athalon vs. Intel

Postby congo » Wed Jan 07, 2004 10:33 am

;D   Give it to 'em Scania!  ;D
ImageMainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24&
User avatar
congo
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3655
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 12:13 am
Location: Australia

PreviousNext

Return to Hardware

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 322 guests