AMD or Intel

Graphics Cards, Sound Cards, Joysticks, Computers, etc. Ask or advise here!

Re: AMD or Intel

Postby flymo » Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:19 pm

i stand by what i say, AMD have a good gameing past and will continue to do so into the future....intel have a good stock build cheapo past and that will continue into the future but from talking to my clan members and gamers i know are still useing AMD and admit that conroe is good, but most of em are planning on AMD's

so if intel are still "on top" in 5 years time cam. i will fly over to michigan or where ever and i will eat my hat!
.... thank god its made of gummy bears :D ;D

john
flymo
 

Re: AMD or Intel

Postby Viper22 » Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:54 pm

Many people still use AMD because they don't have the cash to get a Conroe, and AMD is still perfectly fine for today's games.  But believe me, I am typing right now from my brand new Conroe system and it is unbelievably fast, and they are definitely worth the money.  (Haven't updated sig yet)
Mess with the best, die like the rest.

Core 2 Duo E6600
Gigabyte 965 DQ6
2GB Mushkin DDR2 800
eVGA 7900 GT KO
250GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.10
Silverstone Zeus 750W
Thermaltake shark case modded with green fans and
User avatar
Viper22
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 7:37 pm
Location: CANADA

Re: AMD or Intel

Postby Rifleman » Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:51 pm

Does it really matter which one is on top on any given day ?.....all you have to do is sit back and see which one will perform for your dollar when you have amassed a suitable sum to make a purchase....if one manufacturer drives the other and the technology advances faster because of that fact, then we all win in the end as we can only allot so much of our finances towards the processor of choice when we are ready to take the next step in a never ending story of upgrade attempts........... 8)
Image
User avatar
Rifleman
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5684
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 4:44 pm
Location: Tropical island in the Pacific

Re: AMD or Intel

Postby Bindoe » Fri Oct 13, 2006 2:08 am

Any, company dosn't matter. It depends on speed vs price, and currently intel wins.
Bindoe
 

Re: AMD or Intel

Postby congo » Fri Oct 13, 2006 4:21 am

Any, company dosn't matter. It depends on speed vs price, and currently intel wins.



Not in my neck of the woods. Decent C2D mainboards are excessively expensive here in Australia.
Last edited by congo on Fri Oct 13, 2006 4:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
ImageMainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24&
User avatar
congo
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3655
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 12:13 am
Location: Australia

Re: AMD or Intel

Postby Viper22 » Fri Oct 13, 2006 3:55 pm

Yeah, my core 2 board cost my $250 canadian, and the RAM was $350.
Mess with the best, die like the rest.

Core 2 Duo E6600
Gigabyte 965 DQ6
2GB Mushkin DDR2 800
eVGA 7900 GT KO
250GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.10
Silverstone Zeus 750W
Thermaltake shark case modded with green fans and
User avatar
Viper22
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 7:37 pm
Location: CANADA

Re: AMD or Intel

Postby Boca » Sat Oct 14, 2006 4:10 am

My answer is.......that I thank the lord for BOTH of them. Competition is healthy, it keeps lazy companies on their toes, and forces prices down. If one of these two go out of the game, that'll leave the field open for massive price hikes. Say for example Intel put AMD out of the game, they'd be able to charge up to
User avatar
Boca
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:33 am
Location: Scotland

Re: AMD or Intel

Postby Ivan » Sun Oct 15, 2006 5:43 am

Even though Core Duo v2 is faster, AMD still has the best performance to cost ratio.

And in the end 80% of game performance is from the graphics card anyway...
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

Re: AMD or Intel

Postby ctjoyce » Sun Oct 15, 2006 8:56 am

AMD still has the best performance to cost ratio.


Care to share how you came up with that assesment?

Case in point.

Core 2 Duo E6700 = $501
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6819115002

AM2 FX-62 = $811
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6819103861

The Conroe is $300 cheaper, and still outpreformes the AMD processer. Its the same across the board between AM2 and Core 2.

Cheers
Cameron
CTJoyce, Modding and voiding warranties since 2003
Sheila's Specs:ASUS Striker Extreme 680i, Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2Ghz, Corsair XMS2 PC2-6400C4 2GB, 2x eVGA 7900GT KO,  Western Digital 80GB SATA & 250GB SATAIII
[b]Vesp
User avatar
ctjoyce
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3820
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:42 pm
Location: USA

Re: AMD or Intel

Postby Ivan » Sun Oct 15, 2006 9:12 am


Care to share how you came up with that assesment?

Case in point.

Core 2 Duo E6700 = $501
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6819115002

AM2 FX-62 = $811
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6819103861

The Conroe is $300 cheaper, and still outpreformes the AMD processer. Its the same across the board between AM2 and Core 2.

Cheers
Cameron

Not the processor, but on the total config AMD is cheaper. DDR2 aint the cheapest stuff around, but that will change in a few months.

And the price of the Core Duo v2 will be influenced by the problems Intel has with Transmeta... AMD paid their fees, while intel didnt
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

Re: AMD or Intel

Postby ctjoyce » Sun Oct 15, 2006 1:59 pm

Not the processor, but on the total config AMD is cheaper. DDR2 aint the cheapest stuff around, but that will change in a few months.


I still don't see your point ???

OCZ 1GB (2x 512MB) DDR2-667 = $134
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6820227077

OCZ 1GB (2x 512MB0 DDR-400 = $127
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6820146896

Okay so the DDR2 is $7 more, but in the grand scheme of things its not that much.

And BTW: All AM2 rigs use DDR2, yes 939 is DDR, but 939 is a dead socket.

Cheers
Cameron
Last edited by ctjoyce on Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
CTJoyce, Modding and voiding warranties since 2003
Sheila's Specs:ASUS Striker Extreme 680i, Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2Ghz, Corsair XMS2 PC2-6400C4 2GB, 2x eVGA 7900GT KO,  Western Digital 80GB SATA & 250GB SATAIII
[b]Vesp
User avatar
ctjoyce
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3820
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:42 pm
Location: USA

Re: AMD or Intel

Postby cheesegrater » Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:31 pm

[quote] My answer is.......that I thank the lord for BOTH of them. Competition is healthy, it keeps lazy companies on their toes, and forces prices down. If one of these two go out of the game, that'll leave the field open for massive price hikes. Say for example Intel put AMD out of the game, they'd be able to charge up to
Last edited by cheesegrater on Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
cheesegrater
 

Previous

Return to Hardware

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 552 guests