I think that Flightsim chart you quoted shows the GF FX5900's are performing admirably in that "benchmark".
Especially considering how "old" they are. Remember, not long ago they were a hot item in a desperate market for good graphics, and were at or near the top of the technology of the time. (not only that, I still have one in my system and it does display well enough to play and win current online 3D games at high graphics settings and heavy gaming loads.)
Saying that, yes, it will be replaced in the near future by something newer, but it's certainly been a treat in my PC
The thing that prompted me to comment on this was the reference to the Radeon 9600XT card and it's place in the scheme of things.
I still see a few 9600XT's on offer in online stores. These should NOT be confused with the Excellent Radeon 9800XT card, which is still a very nice graphics card. You don't see 9800XT's on the market any more, and they are effectively replaced by the better NV 6800 series, errrr...... maybe.
Just go back to the FS9 benchmark link you posted and look at the results..... No wonder the 9800XT vanished! Otherwise how would they sell the new cards? What gives? :P
Now, I realise that FS9 is not the be all and end all of performance apps, and that the new cards are probably superior to the 9800XT in many ways, but, the new cards are not the be all and end all either, and could easily be compared to the FX series in the not too distant future.


Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24&