by congo » Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:22 pm
A PCI graphics card on that system is a waste of money. You are still going to have serious problems trying to run CFS3 on it.
The PCI bus is nowhere near as fast as an AGP bus for video data transfer, that's why PCI graphics are not acceptable on gaming machines.
CFS3 is a controversial piece of software. It is difficult to run well even on high end machines.
A much better solution, would be to purchase an nForce2 ultra 400 mainboard with onboard graphics, probably would cost about the same as an addon PCI video card and run twice as fast! These mainboards are cheap, have an AGP slot for a better graphics card later on, and they support 400mhz FSB CPU's up to an XP 3200+
CPU's for that mainboard would be very cheap indeed if you got a 266mhz one, but a slightly more expensive 333mhz CPU is much better.
Getting back to my previous statement, I never, ever recommend onboard graphics to anyone........ they just don't offer enough power either.
Sure, you can get a cool mainboard and kickass CPU (compared to what you have now) VERY CHEAPLY......
but, you need RAM as well, and you will want at least a single 512mb stick of PC3200 - 400mhz ram, and another to match it later on.
This added ram cost is the real burden of upgrading for you now.
What about a decent operating system? Do you have WinXP ?
That is another cost........ if you are running ...say... Win'98 on that old machine, you are getting further and further behind current technologies very quickly. Even the hardware I describe above is now 2 yr old technology!
It's time to ask the boss for a raise I'm afraid.
Last edited by
congo on Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24&