CFS3 vs Il-2 FB

The latest Air Battle game from Microsoft! Running on an entirely new platform, CFS3 is raising it's fair share of problems & opinions - Good & Bad!

Re: CFS3 vs Il-2 FB

Postby BEAR_-_AvHistory » Mon Jun 28, 2004 11:00 pm

605 Scorpion,

The 1% visual was created by Josh ZUYAX Ziebarth as were the other AvHistory Hurricanes err Spitfires.

nickle,

264mph is pretty fast for a climb speed in a WWII aircraft.

Why not use the 164mph IAS of the real aircraft? :)

But hey, the quoted numbers are BS anyway. In 3 minutes the 2400ft+2300ft+2200ft=6900ft, a little short of the 10,000ft climb request.

In level flight at MIL at 10,000ft the P-47 just barely gets up to 318mph IAS (359mph TAS), not leaving much excess horsepower room at 264mph IAS.

So you are correct.
Last edited by BEAR_-_AvHistory on Mon Jun 28, 2004 11:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
BEAR_-_AvHistory
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:58 am

Re: CFS3 vs Il-2 FB

Postby Stormtropper » Tue Jun 29, 2004 8:41 am

Bear, when are you guys gonna release those Hurricanes and that Avenger???????
Arizona State University
Viva la party!


Image
Stormtropper
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1237
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:49 pm
Location: Grosse Pointe, MI

Re: CFS3 vs Il-2 FB

Postby nickle » Tue Jun 29, 2004 10:25 am

Pg281 America's One Hundred Thousand shows the P47 Speed and Climb Performance.  Speed is in TAS.  I converted to IAS std day.  TAS 10K is 365 mph in the climb.

Bear: climb the 47 to 20k on your schedule and post the airspeed and r/c at 5k increments and time.  See if you can beam yourself to 20k.

The published schedule is optimum and will give the best climb performance.  It is not the schedule used operationally.  Normally the fighters took off in sections and divisions.  Rendevouz then climb with several divisions of 4 each squadron.  Speeds were much less to keep the flight together.

I noted during a prop flight in COF that when the  mixture was accidentally substantially reduced that the engine sound and air speed picked up significantly.  Reduction to engine stumble then to smooth then a few clicks more gave better power than did full rich.

I tried this in the 47 mil power in the climb.  Retard mixture to engine stumble, smooth, plus a few clicks gave best power.  Not the way it should work but helps.

I note that cfg shows 47 with supercharger.  Should be auto and I find no way to key on.  Manifold pressure was steady 53 inches during the climb but only went to 15k.
nickle
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 341
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 11:49 am
Location: San Diego, Ca

Re: CFS3 vs Il-2 FB

Postby BEAR_-_AvHistory » Tue Jun 29, 2004 10:30 am

The Hurry's will start to come out soon, but there is no Avenger planed for CFS3 short term.

Next out today or tomorrow will be a Yak-9M in


BEAR - Avhistory
BEAR_-_AvHistory
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:58 am

Re: CFS3 vs Il-2 FB

Postby 4_Series_Scania » Tue Jun 29, 2004 2:14 pm

Interesting thread guys!

My 2c worth, CFS3 over IL2 / FB any time! despite CFS3 running like a dog 8 out of 10 times I try it (The other two times it simply rocks! (?) )  ::)

I'm puzzled to hear of people having problems with IL2/FB - they've always ran fine for me even in my Celeron 700mhz days.......  :-/
Posting drivel here since Jan 31st, 2002. - That long!
"He who laughs last, thinks slowest."
User avatar
4_Series_Scania
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3194
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 4:34 pm
Location: Newport Shropshire U.K.

Re: CFS3 vs Il-2 FB

Postby nickle » Tue Jun 29, 2004 2:37 pm

Ran additional climb test 47 from 10k to 20k.

Mixture lean to stumble at mil power then run smooth results in significant increase in climb performance.

Still poor 47 climb performance.

USAAF specs 4 min 10k to 20k full fuel and ammo.
These were performance tests running the engine at mil power.  Not operationally permitted for normal climbs.  

Mine was 9 min (8:55) 10 to 20, 50 pct fuel.

Ability to climb is a critical fighter characteristic in a dogfight.  Mil or WEP power is used as necessary.

For test I set elevator and aileron sensitivities to 0.950 in cfg from 1.000.  Target r/c 1500 to start at 305 IAS, 10K.
nickle
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 341
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 11:49 am
Location: San Diego, Ca

Re: CFS3 vs Il-2 FB

Postby BEAR_-_AvHistory » Tue Jun 29, 2004 4:31 pm

>>>Still poor 47 climb performance.<<<

Most P-47's did not climb well until the D-23

>>>I noted during a prop flight in COF that when the
Last edited by BEAR_-_AvHistory on Tue Jun 29, 2004 5:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
BEAR_-_AvHistory
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:58 am

Re: CFS3 vs Il-2 FB

Postby nickle » Tue Jun 29, 2004 4:53 pm

I don't use auto mixture.
Mathias was refering to Auto Trim.
Last edited by nickle on Tue Jun 29, 2004 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
nickle
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 341
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 11:49 am
Location: San Diego, Ca

Re: CFS3 vs Il-2 FB

Postby Mathias » Tue Jun 29, 2004 5:00 pm

[quote]I don't use auto mixture.
Mathias was refering to Auto Trim.
Mathias
Image
User avatar
Mathias
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 556
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 10:20 am
Location: Germany

MaybeRe: CFS3 vs Il-2 FB

Postby BEAR_-_AvHistory » Tue Jun 29, 2004 5:54 pm

>>>sorry, but that's getting silly.<<<

Agree, maybe someone else can do "fuel mixture vs altitude 101" for this guy but as of now I am out of here :(

BEAR - AvHistory
Last edited by BEAR_-_AvHistory on Tue Jun 29, 2004 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
BEAR_-_AvHistory
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:58 am

Re: CFS3 vs Il-2 FB

Postby nickle » Tue Jun 29, 2004 6:01 pm

I tested the 47 at 169 mph climb 10k to 20k. Rate of climb was 3000 plus fpm.

I checked on line for another climb speed chart.  Confirmed that 169 mph is ball park.

I reviewed America's Hundred Thousand charts.  The TAS shown are only for Vmax reference.  No climb speeds are shown.

Bear: You are right; my P-47 climb statements were wrong.
nickle
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 341
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 11:49 am
Location: San Diego, Ca

Re: CFS3 vs Il-2 FB

Postby nickle » Tue Jun 29, 2004 7:12 pm

After several AI encounters 1v1 P47 v 109/190.

Neither are much of a problem.  190 easiest of the two.

I changed my Energy tactics based on the 169 climb performance.  I want E for manuver but know that the 47 has good performance at 169 if out of E.  

Setting the Mix to lean plus a few bumps is a significant performance increase. One encounter the Mix was too lean and engine wanted to cut out.  Bump up and reset.

Combination makes the Truck a very good sim dogfighter.  

Makes me happy.
nickle
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 341
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 11:49 am
Location: San Diego, Ca

Re: CFS3 vs Il-2 FB

Postby BEAR_-_AvHistory » Tue Jun 29, 2004 7:49 pm

Nickle,

No Problem.
Last edited by BEAR_-_AvHistory on Tue Jun 29, 2004 8:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
BEAR_-_AvHistory
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:58 am

Re: CFS3 vs Il-2 FB

Postby nickle » Tue Jun 29, 2004 8:18 pm

Inspired by the performance of the P-47, I downloaded the BR F4U.  

Wow: None of the nasty stall habits of the CFS2 versions.

Very nice flying machine.  

Takes more turns vs the 109 because it doesn't have WEP.

Good machine
nickle
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 341
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 11:49 am
Location: San Diego, Ca

Re: CFS3 vs Il-2 FB

Postby nickle » Wed Jun 30, 2004 12:12 pm

For a really depressing 47 performance chart:

http://www.zenoswarbirdvideos.com/Image ... 47TOCL.gif

Note the Climb recommendation a/s and r/c.

The 47C first saw combat Europe in April 43.
47D in process of replacing C models July 43.
Water methanol injection D's begins Nov 43.
Paddle prop install begins D's Dec 43.
Ongoing in April of 44.
Combination gives performance equal to 190 below 15k.

Nov 43 P47 overall kill rate Europe was 3 to 1.
For comparison the F4F vs Japanese was 9 to 1.

May 1944 Maj Gen Kempner states that 47 broke the back of the Luftwaffle.
Last edited by nickle on Wed Jun 30, 2004 6:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
nickle
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 341
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 11:49 am
Location: San Diego, Ca

PreviousNext

Return to Combat Flight Simulator 3

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 270 guests