The bottom line is, we all like CFS3. Most of us have brought, or at least played IL2 and still we like CFS3 more.
Almost a dozen of you, according to the poll results. ;D
Yes there is a flyable Bf-110 in FB, and the cockpit looks better than the one Bear posted IMO.
I certainly don't hate CFS3, I haven't even played it. It's funny to learn that some think if you like one you must hate the other. How strange! I originally came to this forum to try and find out if CFS3 supports the "mouse view". I was considering getting CFS3 & Firepower addon. So far, as far as I can tell CFS3 doesn't support using the mouse to look around, and if that's the case, it's a "show stopper" for me cause that's the only way I know how to look around since I've been doing it that way since Jane's WWII fighters.
Then I saw this thread and thought I would point out some of FB's strengths in comparison to CFS3, and dispell the misconception that FB's maps are flat or whatever.
I like what Mathias wrote:
...are great combat games but just don't confuse them with flight simulators
That's how I see FB: a great air-to-air combat game. My squadmates and I study and practice Real Life combat tactics used by the Luftwaffe, and put them into use flying our virtual Fw-190s against the VVS's best (humans), and we get the same results that we read about from the Experten. I could personally care less if the 190 in FB stalls 10 KPH slower than in real life or whatever. Overall the experience is very convincing to me, a non-pilot. BTW we have a couple of real pilots in my squadron, one was a T-38 instructor in the USAF and built and flys his on lite AC -- FB is good enough for him, so its good enough for me.