I don't have time to install for a full analysis; I downloaded the Pfalz; the aircraft's default folder name is Pfalz_DIIIa_Jasta5 while the aircraft.cfg refers to Pfalz_DIII. For use in combat missions, the aircraft.cfg's "sim=" should be the same as the name of the aircraft's folder.
In this case, either change the folder name to Pfalz_DIII or the reference to sim=Pfalz_DIIIa_Jasta5 -- one or the other, not both.
Similar name consistency with aircraft.cfgs and aircraft folders should be applied to all aircraft.8-)
Are they using the folder name or the sim= name? The added issue is that it can create an unintended cross-reference if another folder should be added that happens to have the name of the "sim=" which will then direct to that folder rather than the one it sits in. Although missions are written differently in CFS2, it uses similar referencing in the .cfgs. For this reason I always try to keep the folder name the same as referenced in its aircraft.cfgHmmmm. If what you say is correct none of the Fox Four Korea aircraft would work in missions. I can assure you they all do.
you Hagar you might be on to something. now question, would useing a different panel make a differance or is that part of the MDL? I realy believe its a graphics issue with my computer. this stupid intergrated graphics is junk. when i can afford it i'll get a new one. but in the meantime i'll try to narrow it down.
i'm going to do that, than i'll take each plane one at a time and see what happens. i wish the aerocrate stuff had better instructions. but oh well i'll get it.
if you have any other ideas Hagar pass them along. you can pm me too.
Are they using the folder name or the sim= name? The added issue is that it can create an unintended cross-reference if another folder should be added that happens to have the name of the "sim=" which will then direct to that folder rather than the one it sits in. Although missions are written differently in CFS2, it uses similar referencing in the .cfgs. For this reason I always try to keep the folder name the same as referenced in its aircraft.cfgHmmmm. If what you say is correct none of the Fox Four Korea aircraft would work in missions. I can assure you they all do.
I don't know if all PJ Walker's aircraft are like this but I noticed it has no 2D panel, just the DVC. The Background BMP defined in Panel.cfg is missing & I get a black band at the bottom of the screen in 2D cockpit view. I'm wondering if this might be causing your problem.
This brings up another rare problem: occasionally someone has a misname between the actual .mdl and item 101 Normal Model File Name = in the .air file; if the names don't match, the aircraft isn't there; either rename the .mdl (and its reference in the model.cfg) accordingly or delete the 101 entry in the .air file (aired needed to open .air file).The Aircraft.cfg sim= entry points to the AIR & DP file in use in that folder, in this case sim=F-86E Sabre.
This brings up another rare problem: occasionally someone has a misname between the actual .mdl and item 101 Normal Model File Name = in the .air file; if the names don't match, the aircraft isn't there; either rename the .mdl (and its reference in the model.cfg) accordingly or delete the 101 entry in the .air file (aired needed).The Aircraft.cfg sim= entry points to the AIR & DP file in use in that folder, in this case sim=F-86E Sabre.
Try these aircraft for WW1...
Stuart Green's excellent work.
http://homepages.domicilium.com/peveril/hangar/wwi.htm
Return to Combat Flight Simulator 2
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 289 guests