X-Plane 9

The Cage...What's YOUR Game? Non MS FS/CFS games screenshots - editing allowed!

X-Plane 9

Postby th3flyboy » Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:37 pm

Well folks, I got X-plane 9, here are some screens i took flying over the nearest city to my house...

one thing you'll notice is that the scenery isn't as detailed in some aspects as FSX. The main problem with the scenery is that the airports have little if any buildings at them, even at LAX. Also there are no landmarks in X-Plane, both of these are caused because the guys who made it, it's only like a 5 person operation, not a freaking 200 person group like ACES.

Now on to the shots:

Image

Image

Image

my one discrepancy i saw there that really stood out though was, THERE IS NO IKEA IN THAT CITY!!!!

all in all, FSX and X-Plane are good to be together, but you can't recommend one over the other, as X-Plane is better at flight modeling, and FSX is prettier and has a bigger community.

oh also, no these are not maxed out, as i didnt want to fly in a slideshow.
Last edited by th3flyboy on Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
my rig
intel q6600 quad core, geforce GTX 280 OCX 1 gig, 4 gigs 800mhz ram, nforce 680i lt sli, 750 gigs hd, dvd rw drive, 23 inch lcd monitor, windows vista ultimate sp2 x64/Win 7 RC x64 dual boot, TrackIR 4 Pro with Trackclip, Razer Lachechis Mouse
User avatar
th3flyboy
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:50 pm

Re: X-Plane 9

Postby waspiflab » Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:55 am

one thing you'll notice is that the scenery isn't as detailed in some aspects as FSX. oh also, no these are not maxed out, as i didnt want to fly in a slideshow


You need higher settings to get the better detail:-? I'm confused :D
Still looks good to me
Image
Image
Image

cheees.
Last edited by waspiflab on Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
waspiflab
 

Re: X-Plane 9

Postby Fozzer » Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:59 am

An excellent example of the disadvantage of using "VFR Photographic Scenery"....

All you see is a perfectly "flat" photograph of the ground.... :o...!

...which is why I abandoned using it it many years ago.. ;)...!

I much prefer Microsoft's automatic 3D Autogen Scenery... [smiley=thumbsup.gif]...!

It may not accurately represent your area, but at least the scenery doesn't  appear as a flat, "blurry" mess at ground level... :o...!

Paul...G-BPLF....FS 2004.... 8-)...!
Win 8.1 64-bit. DX11. Advent Tower. Intel i7-3770 3.9 GHz 8-core. 8 GB System RAM. AMD Radeon HD 7700 1GB RAM. DVD ROM. 2 Terra Byte SATA Hard Drive. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Saitek Cyborg X Fly-5 Joystick. ...and a Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower.
User avatar
Fozzer
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 27361
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 3:11 pm
Location: Hereford. England. EGBS.

Re: X-Plane 9

Postby Slotback » Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:50 am

[quote]An excellent example of the disadvantage of using "VFR Photographic Scenery"....

All you see is a perfectly "flat" photograph of the ground.... :o...!

...which is why I abandoned using it it many years ago.. ;)...!

I much prefer Microsoft's automatic 3D Autogen Scenery... [smiley=thumbsup.gif]...!

It may not accurately represent your area, but at least the scenery doesn't
Last edited by Slotback on Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Slotback
 

Re: X-Plane 9

Postby th3flyboy » Tue Jun 24, 2008 11:08 am

actually, that is the default scenery, as far as the objects though, if I were to crank it up a bit more, the whole ground would be bursting with objects, but when I do that, my flight becomes a slideshow, I'll try to show you guys some higher settings in a little bit, but right now I want to see if I can get some other stuff for it. Also, one thing to note is that X-Plane has a program out there that can convert MSFS 04 and possibly FSX scenery files in to X-Plane, and it is capable of putting in the MSFS addon scenery both payware and freeware and even the default stuff. The reason I don't do that is mine is still a pretty clean install, as I only just got it. As far as the settings, that is about medium on the autogen and maxed as far as ground res. I suspect that the reason the ground is blurry is that to be honest, X-Plane isn't about graphics or storyline missions, and it doesn't have very good AI planes (you wont see them taking off, landing, or taxing, they had this in v7 but when you see the space shuttle making a touch and go at a grass strip, yeah) X-Plane is more based around the actual simulation. The way things are done in X-Plane are not focused mainly on pretty graphics, but are more focused on realistic handling of flight. It's a case of what's more important, pretty graphics, or having birdstrikes that affect your aircraft. Some guy posted on one of the X-Plane community sites a pic of him flying a 747 and a bird struck his windshield and you could see the windshield cracked and the gore on the windshield. That is the uniqueness of X-Plane, not that the sim is pretty, but that it models the more subtle nuances of flight.
my rig
intel q6600 quad core, geforce GTX 280 OCX 1 gig, 4 gigs 800mhz ram, nforce 680i lt sli, 750 gigs hd, dvd rw drive, 23 inch lcd monitor, windows vista ultimate sp2 x64/Win 7 RC x64 dual boot, TrackIR 4 Pro with Trackclip, Razer Lachechis Mouse
User avatar
th3flyboy
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:50 pm

Re: X-Plane 9

Postby waspiflab » Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:26 am

I played the demo and quite liked it maybe if it drops in price I'll think I'll buy it.
Can you post some more shots soon ;)
Cheers.
Last edited by waspiflab on Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
waspiflab
 

Re: X-Plane 9

Postby ozzy72 » Wed Jun 25, 2008 12:25 pm

That is a big jump from X-Plane 8 to 9 :o
Image
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
User avatar
ozzy72
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 33284
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 4:45 am
Location: Madsville


Return to The Cage

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 326 guests