Page 1 of 1

Texan

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:43 am
by GlobalHobo
There has been a break in the very welcome winter rains here in Northern California, which is perfect for some sight-seeing in Warwick Carter's T-6 Texan. It's a gorgeous model, but I almost rejected it when I first loaded it into FSX. It just didn't fly quite right. Not horrible, but not really what I'd expect from the last ship a student flew before strapping on a P-39 or P-40.

Image

In my opinion, there are two additions to this beautiful model which really make it a first-class addition to FSX, and both are by John Terrell. The first, and most important, is an alternate FDE.

Image

Out of the box, the biggest problem I had was that power changes were very erratic. If all you want to do is cruise around at a constant setting, okay, but consistent aerobatics were impossible , and even a smooth approach, other than a power-off circle-to-land was difficult. If you misjudged a little and needed to goose the throttle... well, you might see the power come up before you bounced. Mr. Terrell's FDE took care of that, making this a sweet flyer.

Image

The other required addition is any one of the many super-detailed John Terrell textures which make this great model dazzle. The texture in this post is his "Factory Fresh," but all of his textures have a beautifully subtle variation berween the different metal panels, a nice sheen on the fabric-covered control surfaces and very accurate markings and stencilling.

Image

A note on the scenery: It is Orbyx' NorCal payware which I recently installed and about which I'll gush in another post in the Payware section of the Forum. I just want to note that even as impressuve as the Orbyx product is, they still didn't get the iconic SF Bay Area bridges quite right. Freeware to the rescue! Mike Mahat did a beautiful scenery Package called "Bay Area Bridges," and although published for FS9, it looks great in FSX, too!

Image

The basic packsge is available here: http://simviation.com/1/search?submit=1 ... egoryId=54
I don't know if John Terrell's work is available here, but it is on Flightsim.com. It's worth going to the bother if you like good-looking, good flying freeware.

Image

Re: Texan

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:14 am
by jphespe
THANK YOU for a great post and pix. Very well done. I just downloaded the file and will install it later this morning.

Regards,
Jim

Re: Texan

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 12:53 pm
by yancovitch
oooeeee...super.....!

Re: Texan

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:11 pm
by beegee
There is the FASA T-6 RACERS package based on Warwick Carter's T-6 at http://www.fsxairsports.com/air_racing/ ... -6_Racers/ .
It features: Complete soundset, 20 historic racer liveries, New Flight Dynamics Model, and New systems modelling.

Re: Texan

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 8:01 pm
by BigTruck
Terrific review of this product and thanks for the links!

Re: Texan

PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 5:35 pm
by GlobalHobo
beegee wrote:There is the FASA T-6 RACERS package based on Warwick Carter's T-6 at http://www.fsxairsports.com/air_racing/ ... -6_Racers/ .


Thanks so much for this! I've enjoyed the T-6s up at Reno and have been thinking of doing a few skins of the racers. Happy to see I've been beat to it.
I downloaded the FASA package and will check it out soon.

Re: Texan

PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2016 12:11 am
by logjam
Great pictures, but a note about the handling. I earned my wings on a Harvard, Brits version of the Texan. It was a pig to fly. Underpowered and sensitive as a woman's touch on the power lever. By the time you were qualified, 70% of your class were either dead or scrubbed. Thankfully the RAF changed to the Provost before they lost any more. Just so's you know, you are experiencing close to the real thing.

Re: Texan

PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2016 11:22 am
by GlobalHobo
logjam wrote:Just so's you know, you are experiencing close to the real thing.

Image

Thanks for the real-world feedback. The biggest I ever flew before moving to jets was basically a Bonanza. I know the Wasp radial was a carbureted engine and didn't like unusual attitudes at all. No inverted flight, no spins, only positive-G maneuvers.

Re: Texan

PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2016 5:51 pm
by logjam
They made so many Wasp Jnr engines for the war effort that there was a huge surplus after. That's why the DHC2 Beaver got the Wasp instead of the Alvis Leonides. That engine was produced for helicopters initially, but went on to power tanks and various aircraft for the RAF. If it wasn't so expensive, the Beaver might have gotten more horsepower and less weight.