Airacobra in Papua New Guinea

Flight Simulation Screenshots displaying your Flight Simulation Experience. MSFS, FSX, Prepar3D, XPlane and other Flight Simulators. Focus is your Flight Simulator Experience. Please upload to Simviation (Button at top right)

Airacobra in Papua New Guinea

Postby patchz » Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:05 am

Bell P-400 Airacobra, Aiome to Frieda River.

In 1940, the British Direct Purchase Commission in the US was looking for combat aircraft; they ordered 675 of the export version Bell Model 14 as the "Caribou" on the strength

of the company's representations on 13 April 1940. The performance of the Bell P-39 prototype and 13 test aircraft which were able to achieve a speed of 390 mph (630 km/h)

at altitude was due to the installation of turbo-supercharging. The British armament was two nose mounted 0.50 in (12.7 mm) machine guns, and four 0.303 in (7.7 mm) Browning

machine guns in the wings; the 37 mm gun was replaced by a 20 mm (.79 in) Hispano-Suiza.

The British export models were renamed "Airacobra" in 1941. A further 150 were specified for delivery under Lend-lease in 1941 but these were not supplied. The Royal Air Force (RAF)

took delivery in mid 1941 and found that performance of the non-turbo-supercharged production aircraft differed markedly from what they were expecting. In some areas, the Airacobra

was inferior to existing aircraft such as the Hawker Hurricane and Supermarine Spitfire and its performance at altitude suffered drastically. Tests by the R.A.E at Boscombe Down

showed the Airacobra reached 355 mph (571 km/h) at 13,000 ft (3,962 m). The cockpit layout was criticized, and it was noted that the pilot would have difficulty in baling out in an

emergency because the cockpit roof could not be jettisoned. The lack of a clear vision panel on the windscreen assembly meant that in the event of heavy rain the pilot's forward view

would be completely obliterated; the pilot's notes advised that in this case the door windows would have to be lowered and the speed reduced to 150 mph (241 km/h) On the other

hand it was considered effective for low level fighter and ground attack work. Problems with gun and exhaust flash suppression and the compass could be fixed.

No. 601 Squadron RAF was the only British unit to use the Airacobra operationally, receiving their first two examples on 6 August 1941. On 9 October, four Airacobras attacked enemy

barges near Dunkirk, in the type's only operational action with the RAF. The squadron continued to train with the Airacobra during the winter, but a combination of poor serviceability and

deep distrust of this unfamiliar fighter resulted in the RAF rejecting the type after one combat mission. In March 1942, the unit re-equipped with Spitfires.

The Airacobras already in the UK, along with the remainder of the first batch being built in the US, were sent to the Soviet Air force, the sole exception being AH574, which was passed to

the Royal Navy and used for experimental work, including the first carrier landing by a tricycle undercarriage aircraft on 4 April 1945 on HMS Pretoria Castle, until it was scrapped on the

recommendation of a visiting Bell test pilot in March 1946.

The United States requisitioned 200 of the next part of the order as the P-400. The P-400 designation came from advertised top speed of 400 mph (644 km/h). After Pearl Harbor,

the P-400 was deployed to training units, but some saw combat in the Southwest Pacific including with the Cactus Air Force in the Battle of Guadalcanal. Though outclassed by

Japanese fighter planes, it performed well in strafing and bombing runs, often proving deadly in ground attacks on Japanese forces trying to retake Henderson Field. Guns salvaged

from P-39s were sometimes fitted to Navy PT boats to increase firepower.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Thanks for looking. :)
Image
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
User avatar
patchz
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10424
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: IN THE FUNNY PAPERS

Re: Airacobra in Papua New Guinea

Postby Flying Trucker » Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:00 am

Good morning Larry... :)

Always did like the looks of the Aircobra and well done on your commentary and pictures... ;)
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Flying Trucker
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 14398
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 12:28 pm

Re: Airacobra in Papua New Guinea

Postby patchz » Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:50 pm

Thanks Doug. :)

It has always been one of my favorites. And except for the prop behind the clouds issue and some slight VC problems due to not being native FSX, it is a great model.
Image
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
User avatar
patchz
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10424
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: IN THE FUNNY PAPERS

Re: Airacobra in Papua New Guinea

Postby CHUCK79 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 2:16 pm

Good morning Larry... :)

Always did like the looks of the Aircobra and well done on your commentary and pictures... ;)



+1........shots 1 and 3 for me Larry
User avatar
CHUCK79
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 6168
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:13 am
Location: KOMK

Re: Airacobra in Papua New Guinea

Postby patchz » Thu Jun 23, 2011 6:10 pm

Thanks Chuck. :)
Image
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
User avatar
patchz
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10424
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: IN THE FUNNY PAPERS

Re: Airacobra in Papua New Guinea

Postby jime59 » Sat Jun 25, 2011 11:42 pm

Excellent shots and bio Larry.This reminded me of the RC P-39 I started to build. It had a 5ft wing span and I had modified it from the original kit so the engine was mounted in the middle of the plane, like the real thing, along with retractable landing gear. I got about 75% done with it and ended-up giving it to my cuz, who was an RC fanatic, to finish. Alas, I never heard of it since. That was about 30 years ago. Oh well, right ?

Again, nice story/shots.

jimme
Last edited by jime59 on Sat Jun 25, 2011 11:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The mind is like a parachute...it only works when it's open.
User avatar
jime59
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1607
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: Streamwood,Il

Re: Airacobra in Papua New Guinea

Postby patchz » Sun Jun 26, 2011 1:28 am

Excellent shots and bio Larry.This reminded me of the RC P-39 I started to build. It had a 5ft wing span and I had modified it from the original kit so the engine was mounted in the middle of the plane, like the real thing, along with retractable landing gear. I got about 75% done with it and ended-up giving it to my cuz, who was an RC fanatic, to finish. Alas, I never heard of it since. That was about 30 years ago. Oh well, right ?

Again, nice story/shots.

jimme

Thanks jime. :)

Now that, is one I would like to see fly.
Image
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
User avatar
patchz
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10424
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: IN THE FUNNY PAPERS


Return to Simulation Screenshots Showcase

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 509 guests