Cessna
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 3:24 pmAnd you thought it was going to be a Citation.
Simviation Forums
Flight Simulator and other chat
https://forums.simviation.com/phpBB3/
Cessna
https://forums.simviation.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=146664
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 3:24 pmRe: Cessna
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 6:56 pmI this an FSX model?
Re: Cessna
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 1:57 amNo self-shadow + props behind the clous = FS9 model. 
Nice shots B-Valvs.
Nice shots B-Valvs.
Re: Cessna
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 8:44 amThat's too bad, I'd love to see this plane in FSX.
Re: Cessna
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 2:29 pmRe: Cessna
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 3:31 pmNice shots Brandon! 8-)
I love PAD's stuff, and the fact that I can use them in either sim.
Does anyone know how many 'True' FSX planes there are? :-?
I see this mentioned a lot, but Alrot's & Brett's planes are some of the only ones I've seen, other than the one's that come with FSX. :-/
Does anyone really make these things?
Are they really that much harder than FS9 planes?
Do Payware companies really make two versions using each SDK?
I love PAD's stuff, and the fact that I can use them in either sim.
Does anyone know how many 'True' FSX planes there are? :-?
I see this mentioned a lot, but Alrot's & Brett's planes are some of the only ones I've seen, other than the one's that come with FSX. :-/
Does anyone really make these things?
Are they really that much harder than FS9 planes?
Do Payware companies really make two versions using each SDK?
Re: Cessna
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 3:41 pmThey are liars its a FS9 model , IT works in FSX but its an FS9-SDK
Re: Cessna
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 3:51 pmThe preview picture came up in my sim.
Thanks for the comliments on teh shots.
8-)
Thanks for the comliments on teh shots.
8-)
Re: Cessna
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 3:52 pmDoes anyone make a "True' FSX Cessna C414?
Didn't think so.
PAD never claimed to use the FSX SDK, they use the FS9 SDK so that EVERYONE can enjoy their work.
Didn't think so.
PAD never claimed to use the FSX SDK, they use the FS9 SDK so that EVERYONE can enjoy their work.
Re: Cessna
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 3:55 pmThe preview picture came up in my sim.
Thanks for the comliments on teh shots.
8-)
I would like to see that in blooming , if you trying to convince everyone that FS9 models and FSX models are the same thing and qualiity,.. you have a though work ahead.
Re: Cessna
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 4:28 pm[quote]Nice shots Brandon! 8-)
I love PAD's stuff, and the fact that I can use them in either sim.
Does anyone know how many 'True' FSX planes there are? :-?
I see this mentioned a lot, but Alrot's & Brett's planes are some of the only ones I've seen, other than the one's that come with FSX. :-/
Does anyone really make these things?
Are they really that much harder than FS9 planes?
Do Payware companies really make two versions using each SDK?
I love PAD's stuff, and the fact that I can use them in either sim.
Does anyone know how many 'True' FSX planes there are? :-?
I see this mentioned a lot, but Alrot's & Brett's planes are some of the only ones I've seen, other than the one's that come with FSX. :-/
Does anyone really make these things?
Are they really that much harder than FS9 planes?
Do Payware companies really make two versions using each SDK?
Re: Cessna
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 5:20 pmNot saying there isn't any, Phil's list is proof that they are out there,
What I'm saying is, until every plane is made in FSX format, what is so wrong with using a FS9 plane?
Did everyone hate on FS2002's planes like this when FS9 came out? :-?
Yes, 'True' FSX planes may be better for FSX, but there aren't as many of them, and a lot of them are on only one site or another, making them difficult for the average new user to find. And again, most developers don't make what the user wants, they usually make the planes they like. So the chance of finding what you want gets even slimmer. I think almost every plane has been done in FS9 now (except the F-16XL :'(, come on Aerosoft!), so they are just quick & easy to find, and a nice stop gap until the FSX version is made.
As for the whole bloom & DX 10 part, I don't use the FSX bloom, and I don't have Vista, and won't, so no DX10 for me.
So either way, FSX or FS9 , does it matter how it's made as long as the pilot enjoys it?
What I'm saying is, until every plane is made in FSX format, what is so wrong with using a FS9 plane?
Did everyone hate on FS2002's planes like this when FS9 came out? :-?
Yes, 'True' FSX planes may be better for FSX, but there aren't as many of them, and a lot of them are on only one site or another, making them difficult for the average new user to find. And again, most developers don't make what the user wants, they usually make the planes they like. So the chance of finding what you want gets even slimmer. I think almost every plane has been done in FS9 now (except the F-16XL :'(, come on Aerosoft!), so they are just quick & easy to find, and a nice stop gap until the FSX version is made.
As for the whole bloom & DX 10 part, I don't use the FSX bloom, and I don't have Vista, and won't, so no DX10 for me.
So either way, FSX or FS9 , does it matter how it's made as long as the pilot enjoys it?
Re: Cessna
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 5:38 pmThanks for the link, I was never aware of this site. They even have a Cape Air texture for it.
Re: Cessna
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 5:38 pm[quote]Not saying there isn't any, Phil's list is proof that they are out there,
What I'm saying is, until every plane is made in FSX format, what is so wrong with using a FS9 plane?
Did everyone hate on FS2002's planes like this when FS9 came out? :-?
Yes, 'True' FSX planes may be better for FSX, but there aren't as many of them, and a lot of them are on only one site or another, making them difficult for the average new user to find. And again, most developers don't make what the user wants, they usually make the planes they like. So the chance of finding what you want gets even slimmer.
What I'm saying is, until every plane is made in FSX format, what is so wrong with using a FS9 plane?
Did everyone hate on FS2002's planes like this when FS9 came out? :-?
Yes, 'True' FSX planes may be better for FSX, but there aren't as many of them, and a lot of them are on only one site or another, making them difficult for the average new user to find. And again, most developers don't make what the user wants, they usually make the planes they like. So the chance of finding what you want gets even slimmer.
Re: Cessna
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 5:43 pmSure, but keep in mind that some people cannot enjoy those FS9 aircrafts, for many reasons like:
- they can't afford the FPS hit that an FS9 plane brings
- they cannot afford the FPS hit that is caused by DX9 compared to DX10
- they don't want to mess with the incompatible gauges
- they don't want to mess with the graphic problems
This is acceptable I think.
I'm part of the people that just enjoy any plane, FS9 or FSX, as long as it works (I can deal with graphic problems such as canopies) and it has a usable virtual cockpit... and this last criteria is the most restrictive.
When it comes to the creators of freeware planes, I think most of them cannot afford to switch to FSX for financial reasons. When you take a look at the preview screenshots of some FS9 planes, you can really understand that a lot of them have very old computers, so they have no chance of messing with FSX at all.
And there's this other part of the creators, like PAD, that want to create stuff to please as much people as possible, thus including FS9'ers and FSX'ers
We are clearly on the same page then.
I agree, the planes from FS9 that have not been properly converted have no business being in FSX, but the ones that have, such as PAD's, are just as good in my book.
Well, since we agree that we agree, I guess we can all go fly some planes now.
When you take a look at the preview screenshots of some FS9 planes, you can really understand that a lot of them have very old computers, so they have no chance of messing with FSX at all.
There are more people like this than some think. Myself being one of them, hence why I (and many others) stick with FS9.