Simviation Forums

These are my first Flight Simulator screenshots.  Pictures come first, and a rambling explanation follows.




Now for the boring blah, blah, blah part:

I used FS2004 for the simulator software.  Even though I have FSX, I have to turn many of the settings down so low that I cannot get the same performance as in FS2004.  The potential for more is there in FSX, but it will have to wait for a better system.

I flew the Gippsland GA-8 Airvan (you can find it on this page: http://www.simviation.com/fs2004props152.htm).  After downloading and installing the GA-8, I went to the Gippsland home page (http://www.gippsaero.com) to do a quick comparison between the real thing and the add-on model.  I would humbly suggest the add-on model compares quite favorably to the real aircraft.

The flight was out of Glacier Park Int'l in Kalispell, Montana (KGPI).  I set the weather to building storm fronts in a hope that the various clouds would make the setting a bit more visually interesting.

Overall, there is nothing spectacular about the shots.  My main intention was to get practice in taking screenshots from FS2004 and posting them here on SimV.  I think my favorite is the third shot (FS9_GA8_0007_e-simv.jpg).  This is the shot that to me bears closest resemblance to what I might expect to see in real life, though there are still some deficiencies.

Comments, criticism, and advice are welcome.

~Darrin

Compression could be better...

Compression could be a lot better...

Angles could be better...

Plane could be a little closer... maybe a lot closer...

The scenery and clouds are quite nice, but the compression and zoom distance do not do that scenery justice at all.

Oh well, this isn't the screenshot contest, so you can always try again. Try and aim for a zoom distance like you have on the runway, and use the plane to put a little "oomph" into the shot, like having it do something besides fly straight and level all the time. And I'd suggest picking up Irfanview here to help deal with that compression.

Not a bad first attempt, though. Just take what I said into account and you should be pumping out gallery-worthy classics quite soon.

JR,

Thanks for your comments.  I was concerned about the compression a great deal.  I was struggling between making the picture large enough to see (trying to keep it at 800 pixels wide) while getting things at or below the 100k file size limit.  Looks like I could use a lot more practice juggling those factors.

Blandness was something else I felt a struggle with.  I think I was perhaps just so focused on taking shots, resizing them, and posting that I did not give due consideration to overall composition.  Another frustration was trying to find the best way to present something that even slightly resembled reality.  Not only handicapped by my inexperience in setting up the compositional elements of the image,  I am further constrained by the limitations of my 'bargain' system.

All that being said, thanks again for your comments and advice.  Certainly some important things to think about and directions to try.

All the best,
~Darrin

A good way to exorcize blandness is to fly, basically at treetop level, or below or at least slightly above the mountain peaks. Impress people with your one-three-three-seven (1337 or leet ) flying skills.

If you want, you could take a look at my most recent showcase (Beautiful Glacier bay...) to see what I mean.

Try getting your AA & AF set a bit higher even if only for the purpose of getting a better shot. They look pretty good I do agree you should get closer to whatever aircraft you are trying to fly.

Oh something I just realized, dawn and dusk shots for the most part compress better, well at least for me

Try getting your AA & AF set a bit higher even if only for the purpose of getting a better shot. They look pretty good I do agree you should get closer to whatever aircraft you are trying to fly.

Oh something I just realized, dawn and dusk shots for the most part compress better, well at least for me

AA, AF?  :-?

aa stands for anti aliasing, don't exactly know what af stands for :-/

Good to see an Austrailian built aircraft doing so well.

BTW, good shots!

Interesting model - the main thing which struck me is how far away the plane is, followed by the large areas of the same bland texture. Some airport scenery on takeoff would be nice - if you are flying in VOZ there are some nice airfields there by default.

Anti aliasing and anisotropic filtering (AF) need to be adjusted on you graphics card - best there and not in-sim.
Dear me I almost wrote in-game for a moment. Would have got my wrist slapped  :D

Get freeware F1 view from the Flight 1 website....really helps with angles, composition. Gives freedom and variety, zooming possibilies too  :)

Compression is a tightrope - adjust each pic in irfanview or PS or whatever individually...as you seem to have done, nice one!

Cheers and happy screenshooting

Krigl