Page 1 of 2

Project Fokker F28

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 2:51 am
by glennlcasey
Hey there, found this little beauty over on Avsim. and fell in love with her. She is magnificent, these pics dont do her justice. some features include over wing shots, a cd player, heat exhaust, realistic start up sounds. Gorgeous. Feel free to drool as much as i did.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Re: Project Fokker F28

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:08 am
by an-225
Great shots. ;) I've tried that Fokker before...it didn't have a VC, however the developers stated that they would implement a VC. Does it have one?  ;)

Re: Project Fokker F28

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:12 am
by glennlcasey
no it doesnt have a vc, bit mfifed, thought i had installed it wrong. but according to the website, its a base package version 1 and wasnt  going to have a vc in it. so the pop up panels do make up for it in some sense.

Re: Project Fokker F28

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 4:30 am
by pepper_airborne
I talked to the developers 2 years ago and they said that there not planning on any VC.

Re: Project Fokker F28

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 5:46 am
by fabiane
Hurray!!! The F.28! Great shots!
Now excuse me I'll have to download it right now and start a flight in TAME livery, if it's already available!

Edit: 530, We are really busy right now!  :P Argh!

Cheers,
Fabian

Re: Project Fokker F28

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:02 am
by glennlcasey
yes the tame livery comes with the download as well as the prototype colours and the nlm cityhopper scheme. new liveries available from the site soon

Re: Project Fokker F28

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:41 am
by ATI_7500
No VC. No drooling. No fly.

When are developers going to realize that those flat images with gauges on them are way too outdated?

Re: Project Fokker F28

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:00 am
by pepper_airborne
There argument was that less then 10% flew on the VC.

Re: Project Fokker F28

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:44 am
by ATI_7500
There argument was that less then 10% flew on the VC.


That's 10% less positive reviews, 10% less downloads and 10% less fans.

Re: Project Fokker F28

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:13 am
by Mees
::)


It's finally there! :D I might just go to church to thank the lord! :o

Re: Project Fokker F28

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:02 am
by Ivan
There argument was that less then 10% flew on the VC.


That's 10% less positive reviews, 10% less downloads and 10% less fans.

VC + jet with steam gauges = bad fps. Every developer knows that. If you want your addon to be useable on the largest amount of PCs you'll have to kill the VC (or go for something with CRTs)

Re: Project Fokker F28

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:05 am
by fighter25
Wowwwwwwwwwwwwwww! :o Amazing! Where did you find this? I want it! :-*
Great shots!! 8-)
But what is in the first shot?

Re: Project Fokker F28

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:26 am
by ashaman
Edit: 530, We are really busy right now!  :P Argh!


When this happens do like you do in Nonodes. ;D

Try and retry until they get bored at your hardheadedness and let you download. ;)

Like I always did, and always have had the upper hand in the end. :P

Re: Project Fokker F28

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:18 pm
by ATI_7500
VC + jet with steam gauges = bad fps.


- BAC 1-11
- HS.748/780
- Trident

Bad FPS? No way!

Re: Project Fokker F28

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 1:26 pm
by Ivan
VC + jet with steam gauges = bad fps.


- BAC 1-11
- HS.748/780
- Trident

Bad FPS? No way!

Good planes but bad examples.
None of the authors of these has the need to prove that they can do payware.... project Fokker has (new F70/100 will probably be payware)
So consider this one a rushed job