Page 1 of 4
Ground textures comparison
Posted:
Sun Oct 16, 2005 4:51 pmby ATI_7500
Bluesphere and nwald.zip:
Colorized textures:
Cororized textures and nwald.zip (flightsim):
The latter is my new setup. Thanks for the heads-up, Nick. Those colored textures look nice together with those forest textures.
For a link, see Nick's thread.
Re: Ground textures comparison
Posted:
Sun Oct 16, 2005 5:44 pmby flyboy 28
I am assuming the first one is default?
*looks at Nicks thread*
Re: Ground textures comparison
Posted:
Sun Oct 16, 2005 5:45 pmby Rocket_Bird
The new textures do look good, however i kinda like the first shot at the very top.. looks more realistic for me... but then again thats probably because I live in the prairies too ;D
Re: Ground textures comparison
Posted:
Sun Oct 16, 2005 5:50 pmby killerbunny
What forest textures do you use?
Re: Ground textures comparison
Posted:
Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:59 amby cspyro21
Man I need to get the contents of that last shot....adds a nice spice of colour to an otherwise grey-ish landscape.
When you say check Nick's thread, are we talking the NIXMIX one or no?
Cheers ;)
Re: Ground textures comparison
Posted:
Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:12 amby NicksFXHouse
[quote]Man I need to get the contents of that last shot....adds a nice spice of colour to an otherwise grey-ish landscape.
When you say check Nick's thread, are we talking the NIXMIX one or no?
Cheers
Re: Ground textures comparison
Posted:
Mon Oct 17, 2005 4:52 amby Tweek
I think I still prefer the BlueSphere textures out of the three. The colours need to be deeper, rather than heavily saturated. Of course, you'd need to saturate it a bit, but not to the point where you're flying over Legoland!
Re: Ground textures comparison
Posted:
Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:05 amby Fitter
I like the textures in the third shot.....
Re: Ground textures comparison
Posted:
Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:05 amby ATI_7500
I am assuming the first one is default?
Is not.
What forest textures do you use?
No f+cking comment. Simply read. >:(
I think I've got it quite realistic now. Just look at this photo:
http://www.atpm.com/6.01/aerial/images/aerial_06.jpg
Re: Ground textures comparison
Posted:
Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:05 amby Tweek
Here's what I mean:
I edited the picture by adding about +10 saturation, and altering the levels. This still keeps that realistic look of the BlueSphere textures, though without being too washed out, and without being too colourful like the others. If it's possible to just alter the levels and slightly saturate the textures, that would be good..
Re: Ground textures comparison
Posted:
Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:06 amby ATI_7500
If it's possible to just alter the levels and slightly saturate the textures, that would be good..
Umm...you would have to edit thousands of textures for that.
Re: Ground textures comparison
Posted:
Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:08 amby Tweek
Umm...you would have to edit thousands of textures for that.
That's why I said 'if'
Re: Ground textures comparison
Posted:
Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:37 amby Woodlouse2002
I think its a great improvement. For all everyones tweaking and FSGS improvements people seem to have forgotten that grass is green. Not grey.
Re: Ground textures comparison
Posted:
Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:46 amby killerbunny
No f+cking comment. Simply read. >:(
Tx for your kind help
Re: Ground textures comparison
Posted:
Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:06 amby ATI_7500
Tx for your kind help
Sorry, but it simply upsets me if someone only looks at the pics and doesn't read the written parts.
