Page 1 of 1
HawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawk
Posted:
Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:34 pmby ATI_7500
Re: HawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawk
Posted:
Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:53 pmby ChuckMajik
Very nice shots, but the number on the fuselage in the last shot should say 155019.
No fault on you what-so-ever, just thought I'd point it out.
Re: HawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawk
Posted:
Sat Aug 27, 2005 2:46 pmby jordonj
Hawk if you must but no Loogies!
Great shots too!
Re: HawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawk
Posted:
Sat Aug 27, 2005 6:18 pmby eno
OMG ........ he's done it too :P
Re: HawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawk
Posted:
Sat Aug 27, 2005 6:31 pmby TSC.
soooo...................is it just Hawks in this post then??
Great shots Heretic,
TSC.
Re: HawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawk
Posted:
Sat Aug 27, 2005 7:09 pmby Souichiro
Beauties Bjorn! Can't wait to fly them tomorrow!
Stupid work!
Re: HawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawk
Posted:
Sun Aug 28, 2005 3:08 amby Omag 2.0
Amazing! What more can I say!
Re: HawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawk
Posted:
Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:18 amby Mr.Mugel
Nice shots, does this one have a full VC ? The T-1 version looked a bit down-made for the freeware version (Or my old FS2002 couldn
Re: HawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawk
Posted:
Sun Aug 28, 2005 9:15 amby jordonj
Well, as I said before, from what I understand, DSB isn't known for ultra-detailed VCs (compared to say, real air or Cloud 9). This isn't to say that they're bad (far from it!)
For myself, the fact that these have been released as freeware, along with the Lyons planes, and the Christensen Eagle, this has been a great month to be a simmer!
Re: HawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawk
Posted:
Mon Aug 29, 2005 2:53 amby Omag 2.0
Can i be frank?
So, now that you all know me as frank, I'll be blunt...
I'm a bit dissapointed in these models as they are former pay-ware. I'm not really impressed.
They miss some creativity in the texture department and I've seen better freeware models out there...
I know they are a bit older but still... makes me feel very happy beeing only a freeware-guy, as I don't think I would have payed for these...
Re: HawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawk
Posted:
Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:58 amby ATI_7500
Me neither. Same with the Simtech models, which were comparable to Abacus planes in the quality department.
Re: HawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawkHawk
Posted:
Tue Aug 30, 2005 4:33 pmby kriglus
A fabulous set of shots! Lovely and summery!
I haven't tried these products but from some products released as freeware and screenshots of various scenery enhancements I have to agree with previous posts... a lot of payware doesn't seem to be "all that". I guess you have to be cautious, well-informed or rich to dive into the payware scene and not be disappointed.
