canberra bomber...

Flight Simulation Screenshots displaying your Flight Simulation Experience. MSFS, FSX, Prepar3D, XPlane and other Flight Simulators. Focus is your Flight Simulator Experience. Please upload to Simviation (Button at top right)

canberra bomber...

Postby lemoncat » Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:36 pm

a nice new canberra with lots of nice animations with vc
very nice to fly and a great model..lovely :) :)
you can d/l it here>> http://devtas.net/holker/

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
lemoncat
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4286
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 6:41 pm
Location: earth

Re: canberra bomber...

Postby Hai Perso Coyone? » Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:38 pm

those are some of the best picstures i have seen : :o

is the aircraft compatible with FS2002?

again Nice Pictures.

Ashar
User avatar
Hai Perso Coyone?
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:31 pm
Location: Rome, Italy

Re: canberra bomber...

Postby Woodlouse2002 » Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:43 pm

I would like to know how the bomb and ejection animations work.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!

Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains c
User avatar
Woodlouse2002
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10369
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:51 pm
Location: Cornwall, England

Re: canberra bomber...

Postby congo » Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:44 pm

Methinks those ejection seats could be very handy in that bomber Lemoncat!

Excellent screenshots
ImageMainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24&
User avatar
congo
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3655
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 12:13 am
Location: Australia

Re: canberra bomber...

Postby lemoncat » Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:18 pm

thanks i think this is a real gem always liked the canberra..
main exit for ejector.maybe water rudder for bombs and concorde visor for bomb bay i think..check out the animation on the air brakes very nice :) :)
User avatar
lemoncat
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4286
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 6:41 pm
Location: earth

Re: canberra bomber...

Postby jordonj » Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:46 pm

Wow!  What an interesting aircraft!
My first flight in a 172 on August 20, 2004
Image

Doing the right thing is more important than doing the thing right. (P. Drucker)

When all think alike, then no one i
User avatar
jordonj
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5314
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 11:40 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: canberra bomber...

Postby Hagar » Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:58 pm

Very nice shots as always Lemoncat. The Canberra was always one of my favourites. ;)

Methinks those ejection seats could be very handy in that bomber Lemoncat!

Very neat. As a matter of interest 2 members of a Canberra crew were killed after ejecting from a Canberra recently. http://www.rafmarham.co.uk/relations/stories/canberra-t4.htm

Charlie knows more about it than me but I think it was quite likely they would have survived if they hadn't ejected. The aircraft was fitted with an older type of seat not intended for use at ground level..
Last edited by Hagar on Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: canberra bomber...

Postby lemoncat » Tue Dec 21, 2004 11:50 pm

thanx :)
yes pete i'm still testing the new lennart's textures out still can't decide which one's to use yet :) :)
User avatar
lemoncat
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4286
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 6:41 pm
Location: earth

Re: canberra bomber...

Postby Woodlouse2002 » Wed Dec 22, 2004 12:41 pm


Very neat. As a matter of interest 2 members of a Canberra crew were killed after ejecting from a Canberra recently. http://www.rafmarham.co.uk/relations/stories/canberra-t4.htm

Charlie knows more about it than me but I think it was quite likely they would have survived if they hadn't ejected. The aircraft was fitted with an older type of seat not intended for use at ground level..

I was under the impression that ejector seats were invented specifically so that pilots could bail out at ground level.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!

Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains c
User avatar
Woodlouse2002
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10369
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:51 pm
Location: Cornwall, England

Re: canberra bomber...

Postby Hagar » Wed Dec 22, 2004 1:28 pm

I was under the impression that ejector seats were invented specifically so that pilots could bail out at ground level.

Not at all Woody. Ejector seats were originally developed to throw the occupant clear of projecting parts of an aircraft travelling at high speeds. I think the first US-designed ejector seats exited downwards through the bottom of the fuselage. I remember being surprised on seeing them in films of USAF jets at the time. The idea didn't look that practical to me & this type would obviously be no use below a certain altitude. The Martin-Baker upward firing seat was later adopted by most military services. The latest ones are rocket powered but the type of seat fitted probably depends on the type of aircraft.

Don't forget the Canberra has been in service for a very long time, something like 50 years. I don't know which Mark of seat this example was fitted with or if the Canberra was ever updated with the latest ones. I'm certain the investigation report mentioned the type of seat being the main factor for the crew being killed. You can read the history of the Martin-Baker seats here. http://www.martin-baker.co.uk/Acrobat/History_Development_of_MBA.pdf It's a big PDF file so it might be an idea to right-click & download it to your HD.
Last edited by Hagar on Wed Dec 22, 2004 1:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: canberra bomber...

Postby logjam » Wed Dec 22, 2004 2:10 pm

The Martin Baker CMk1 seat was designed to operate or assist survival at a height of 1000' and 125Kt,  but here's a dramatic account written by Flt Lt Ken Topaz who survived an ejection at ground level and 80Kt. http://www.ejectionsite.com/nochute.htm This account is very similar to my own experience at Kai Tak in 1998 although all 3 of us survived a dip in the ocean. none of us have been allowed to fly in aircraft fitted with ejector seats. I believe I am the only one to actually return to flying as a profession. The link shows pictures of the 2 rear positions, which will enable you to better understand how, with a bone dome, it is nigh impossible to reach the FBH (Face blind handle). Also, some Navs never removed the safety pin from their seat because they claimed that clumsy AEO's might accidentally pull the SPH as they moved from the prone position to the rear. There's more, but it's better said from someone else. :-[
Image

Making a World of Difference
User avatar
logjam
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1301
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2002 3:10 am
Location: Lillooet, BC Canada

Re: canberra bomber...

Postby jordonj » Wed Dec 22, 2004 3:10 pm

That is frightning!
My first flight in a 172 on August 20, 2004
Image

Doing the right thing is more important than doing the thing right. (P. Drucker)

When all think alike, then no one i
User avatar
jordonj
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5314
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 11:40 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: canberra bomber...

Postby d0mokun » Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:12 pm

there were 3 guys on the cranberry that crashed over here, they all banged i believe but only one guy survived, just around 2kts over the envelope.

there is a supposed cause of crash according to a contact i have, but im not going to put it here as its not my place. its just such a shame it happened though.

anyway, does this cranberry look good inside? Needs raf textures though ;)

Annd a T17 wouldnt go amiss  ;D
Regards,
Dano

Daniel Dunn
StudioTwentyOne design team

Formerly known as Moomin_dan ...
User avatar
d0mokun
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1145
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2002 12:24 pm
Location: Staffs, UK

Next

Return to Simulation Screenshots Showcase

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 591 guests