CFS3, However, the FS2002 shots look better.......
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2003 1:05 pm
by 4_Series_Scania
I'm not dead!
Re: CFS3, However, the FS2002 shots look better...
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2003 2:21 pm
by ozzy72
Hi Scania, I see you failed to get the Grandslam on the Dome and do us all a favour....... Your screenies from CFS3 do not look happy, I've got a lesser system than yours and I'm really pleased. Have tried all the tweaks?
Ozzy
Re: CFS3, However, the FS2002 shots look better...
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2003 4:53 pm
by Whitey
No, yours do not look like a happy bunny...
If you'd like to see what CFS3 can look like with a little (well, a lot actually) of TLC, go back and find my '6th June 1944' and 'Little Friends' pics.
I still love that Lancaster, though.
Re: CFS3, However, the FS2002 shots look better...
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2003 11:45 pm
by BMan1113VR
nice shots there scania. . .saw you around in the caf
Re: CFS3, However, the FS2002 shots look better...
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 3:19 am
by HawkerTempest5
Mr. Scannia, welcome back Love the Lancaster shots and I agree about the quality of your FS2K2 shots looking better than your CFS3. There have been some very nice CFS3 shots showing up recently so I guess it is possible to make it look good but most people seam to go through a lot of tweeking to get it looking good. I should not really comment however because I canned CFS3 ages ago!
Re: CFS3, However, the FS2002 shots look better...
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 5:28 pm
by AnGeL_MaKeR
Nice CFS3 shots there!!
Re: CFS3, However, the FS2002 shots look better...
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 5:40 pm
by d0mokun
nice pics... but..
does anyone else think those ships look like they got reheat lol... 8)