Page 1 of 1
compare
Posted:
Wed Apr 09, 2003 8:00 amby PSYCO
The top one is from my beloved Falcon 4.0.The bottom is from msFS 2002 pro.witch one is better guys
[img]http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/lion.jpg
[/img]
[img]http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/mgnet.jpg
[/img]
[img]http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/mgnet2.jpg
[/img]
[img]http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/rollin.jpg
[/img]
[img]http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/rollin2.jpg
[/img]
[img]http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/thud.jpg
[/img]
Re: compare
Posted:
Wed Apr 09, 2003 10:06 amby Eric_Rose
Well, coming from a very avid fan of Falcon 4.0, I just can't turn away! I love the Falcon 4.0 version! All the moving parts, sound, airbreaks, the incredible afterburner effects. I just think that nothing compares!
Eric
Re: compare
Posted:
Wed Apr 09, 2003 10:48 amby Mr. Bones
looking to these shots, i'd say Falcon 4.0 is the best one but...
first of all...there are much better F-16 versions available for FS2002...
and keep in mind that FS is developped to be a flightsim for civil aviation, not for fighter planes. if you put lets say a jumbo in falcon 4.0 and then compare it with FS2002 you would also say: FS is the best. what i wanna say is that you can't compare different flightsims developped for different purposes.
just my opinion ;)
Re: compare
Posted:
Wed Apr 09, 2003 11:42 amby DeepSpace
[quote]looking to these shots, i'd say Falcon 4.0 is the best one but...
first of all...there are much better F-16 versions available for FS2002...
and keep in mind that FS is developped to be a flightsim for civil aviation, not for fighter planes. if you put lets say a jumbo in falcon 4.0 and then compare it with FS2002 you would also say: FS is the best. what i wanna say is that you can't compare different flightsims developped for different purposes.
just my opinion
Re: compare
Posted:
Wed Apr 09, 2003 11:54 amby ATI_7500
falcon 4.0, of course! are you guys already playing it with SP3??
Re: compare
Posted:
Wed Apr 09, 2003 6:13 pmby PSYCO
I wasn't trying to compare the two flight sims just the eyecandy
Can you give me a link or maybe a screenie of this better F-16? would love to see it.
Re: compare
Posted:
Thu Apr 10, 2003 11:25 amby PSYCO
So whos' got the baddest F-16?
Re: compare
Posted:
Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:02 amby ATI_7500
MSFS 2002
Re: compare
Posted:
Fri Apr 11, 2003 10:49 amby Whitey
The combat F-16 is better in Falcon 4.0...but I think the Thunderbirds one is better in FS2002.
BTW, is the Thunderbirds repaint for the LAGO F-16?
Re: compare
Posted:
Sat Apr 12, 2003 12:24 amby BFMF
It sure looks like LAGO's F-16
Re: compare
Posted:
Sat Apr 12, 2003 12:30 amby Blade
Colicab, what brings you to think FS was meant ONLY to be a civil aviation program? Just because it doesn't have defualt military jets doesn't make it a civil game. Anyways if MS ever attemped to make a F-16 or F/A-18 like they did the default FS aircraft, it would be shameful.
Re: compare
Posted:
Sat Apr 12, 2003 12:53 amby OakRaiders
I love the F-16 i got emm in ANG NewMexico & Arizona my favorite!