compare

Flight Simulation Screenshots displaying your Flight Simulation Experience. MSFS, FSX, Prepar3D, XPlane and other Flight Simulators. Focus is your Flight Simulator Experience. Please upload to Simviation (Button at top right)

compare

Postby PSYCO » Wed Apr 09, 2003 8:00 am

The top one is from my beloved Falcon 4.0.The bottom is from msFS 2002 pro.witch one is better guys
Image
Image
[img]http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/lion.jpg
[/img]
[img]http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/mgnet.jpg
[/img]
[img]http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/mgnet2.jpg
[/img]
[img]http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/rollin.jpg
[/img]
[img]http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/rollin2.jpg
[/img]
[img]http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/thud.jpg
[/img]
Last edited by PSYCO on Fri Apr 25, 2003 7:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImage[URL=http://www.f-15estrikeeagle.com/][img]http://www.f-15e
User avatar
PSYCO
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 9:49 am
Location: USA

Re: compare

Postby Eric_Rose » Wed Apr 09, 2003 10:06 am

Well, coming from a very avid fan of Falcon 4.0, I just can't turn away! I love the Falcon 4.0 version! All the moving parts, sound, airbreaks, the incredible afterburner effects. I just think that nothing compares!
Eric
User avatar
Eric_Rose
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2002 12:43 am

Re: compare

Postby Mr. Bones » Wed Apr 09, 2003 10:48 am

looking to these shots, i'd say Falcon 4.0 is the best one but...

first of all...there are much better F-16 versions available for FS2002...
and keep in mind that FS is developped to be a flightsim for civil aviation, not for fighter planes. if you put lets say a jumbo in falcon 4.0 and then compare it with FS2002 you would also say: FS is the best. what i wanna say is that you can't compare different flightsims developped for different purposes.

just my opinion  ;)
Raw power...the J-58.
Image

My Anet collection.
Mr. Bones
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3969
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2002 10:32 am

Re: compare

Postby DeepSpace » Wed Apr 09, 2003 11:42 am

[quote]looking to these shots, i'd say Falcon 4.0 is the best one but...

first of all...there are much better F-16 versions available for FS2002...
and keep in mind that FS is developped to be a flightsim for civil aviation, not for fighter planes. if you put lets say a jumbo in falcon 4.0 and then compare it with FS2002 you would also say: FS is the best. what i wanna say is that you can't compare different flightsims developped for different purposes.

just my opinion
DeepSpace
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2002 11:55 am
Location: Israel

Re: compare

Postby ATI_7500 » Wed Apr 09, 2003 11:54 am

falcon 4.0, of course! are you guys already playing it with SP3??
ATI_7500
 

Re: compare

Postby PSYCO » Wed Apr 09, 2003 6:13 pm

I wasn't trying to compare the two flight sims just the eyecandy ::)Can you give me a link or maybe a screenie of this better F-16? would love to see it.
Last edited by PSYCO on Thu Apr 10, 2003 11:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImage[URL=http://www.f-15estrikeeagle.com/][img]http://www.f-15e
User avatar
PSYCO
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 9:49 am
Location: USA

Re: compare

Postby PSYCO » Thu Apr 10, 2003 11:25 am

So whos' got the baddest F-16? ??? ???
ImageImage[URL=http://www.f-15estrikeeagle.com/][img]http://www.f-15e
User avatar
PSYCO
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 9:49 am
Location: USA

Re: compare

Postby ATI_7500 » Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:02 am

MSFS 2002 ;)
ATI_7500
 

Re: compare

Postby Whitey » Fri Apr 11, 2003 10:49 am

The combat F-16 is better in Falcon 4.0...but I think the Thunderbirds one is better in FS2002. ::)

BTW, is the Thunderbirds repaint for the LAGO F-16?
Whitey
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2002 6:14 pm

Re: compare

Postby BFMF » Sat Apr 12, 2003 12:24 am

It sure looks like LAGO's F-16
BFMF
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 16266
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 6:06 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: compare

Postby Blade » Sat Apr 12, 2003 12:30 am

Colicab, what brings you to think FS was meant ONLY to be a civil aviation program? Just because it doesn't have defualt military jets doesn't make it a civil game. Anyways if MS ever attemped to make a F-16 or F/A-18 like they did the default FS aircraft, it would be shameful.
Image

Dell 4550
P4 2.53Ghz
512MB DDR SDRAM
GeForceFX 5900 129MB
60GB HD @ 7200RPM
PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN
User avatar
Blade
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2368
Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 4:05 pm
Location: Annapolis, MD

Re: compare

Postby OakRaiders » Sat Apr 12, 2003 12:53 am

I love the F-16 i got emm in ANG NewMexico & Arizona my favorite!
User avatar
OakRaiders
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 565
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 7:32 am
Location: LongIsland N.Y.


Return to Simulation Screenshots Showcase

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 429 guests