New (Idfg) A321-SAS

Flight Simulation Screenshots displaying your Flight Simulation Experience. MSFS, FSX, Prepar3D, XPlane and other Flight Simulators. Focus is your Flight Simulator Experience. Please upload to Simviation (Button at top right)

New (Idfg) A321-SAS

Postby J41 » Wed May 12, 2004 6:59 pm

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
J41
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 349
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:29 am
Location: England UK

Re: New (Idfg) A321-SAS

Postby jrpilot » Wed May 12, 2004 8:10 pm

When I think of the smaller airbuses (A319-320-321) I think of maircraft that are used for regional and smaller flights...but looking at the lenght of that aircraft it shows how not small they are
jrpilot
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2178
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 3:04 pm

Re: New (Idfg) A321-SAS

Postby Nexus » Wed May 12, 2004 8:29 pm

The A321 is by no means a plane used for small and regional flights. The range of the A321 matches the new 737's

However, the A318 (baby bus) is fighting in the same category as the CRJ's and ERJ's and to a certain extent the B717 :)
Last edited by Nexus on Wed May 12, 2004 8:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nexus
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3240
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:18 pm

Re: New (Idfg) A321-SAS

Postby foo_fighter » Thu May 13, 2004 12:22 am

:) ;) :D ;D

Nice new IFDG
JUST ONE WORD: FREEWARE! The more free it is, the more shall I fly!
Nice Flights 4 Every1
User avatar
foo_fighter
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1604
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 2:36 pm
Location: Sao Jose dos Campos, Sao Paulo

Re: New (Idfg) A321-SAS

Postby ozzy72 » Thu May 13, 2004 5:08 am

That paintjob looks great, fantastic shots there J41 ;)

Ozzy
Image
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
User avatar
ozzy72
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 33284
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 4:45 am
Location: Madsville

Re: New (Idfg) A321-SAS

Postby Ambassador » Thu May 13, 2004 8:25 am

Nice airplane. :)
Ambassador
 

Re: New (Idfg) A321-SAS

Postby SideWinder9 » Thu May 13, 2004 4:28 pm

Nice shots J41. I don't know why airlines would choose those types of engines though. Personally, i think the other type of engine (CFM 56) is way better looking and it performs a little bit better. MTU powered planes are actually a bit underpowered.
Image


Sim-V member since 2003!
User avatar
SideWinder9
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1544
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 1:08 pm
Location: Denver,CO

Re: New (Idfg) A321-SAS

Postby Nexus » Thu May 13, 2004 4:47 pm

Nice shots J41. I don't know why airlines would choose those types of engines though. Personally, i think the other type of engine (CFM 56) is way better looking and it performs a little bit better. MTU powered planes are actually a bit underpowered.


Thrust rating isn't everything...weight is also important.
The GE90 (777 engine) is the most powerful one outthere. So logically that would be the most popular one of them all. But in fact...the airlines don't need all that thrust, heck almost every take-off is de-rated in some way or another. GE90 is also the heaviest, so why fly around with extra weight when you don't need all the power.
Last edited by Nexus on Thu May 13, 2004 4:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nexus
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3240
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:18 pm

Re: New (Idfg) A321-SAS

Postby SideWinder9 » Thu May 13, 2004 6:21 pm

Nexus-
I didn't think of the weight issue. That is deffinetly another factor. Still, those CFM 56's are way cooler I think.

*FRONTIERGUY*
Last edited by SideWinder9 on Thu May 13, 2004 6:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image


Sim-V member since 2003!
User avatar
SideWinder9
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1544
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 1:08 pm
Location: Denver,CO


Return to Simulation Screenshots Showcase

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 957 guests