dx10

[drtomkat]

acceleration is great no problems for me at all.please ignore the overspeed on the bottom

[Ashar]

Quite frankly, I can't tell a difference :-/ :-/

[ThatOnePerson]

I think the real benefit in FSX with Dx10 is performance.

[john_uk]

Quite frankly, I can't tell a difference :-/ :-/

DX10 is not going to suddenly make everything look ub3r cool ash, it should just give  performance boost and allow you have  a little more eye candy. all DX is is a software relationship to your hardware... (i think )

[Slotback]

I think the real benefit in FSX with Dx10 is performance.

Lightbloom looks slightly diferant, most notably the removal of the bloom reflection shaped like an 'X'. Water has better reflections and wind affects the water. Also there are VC shadows.

None of them, apart from the bloom is really noticable in that shot, however, performance in DX10 can be 20% better, or even more with some configerations.

[Katahu]

I think the real benefit in FSX with Dx10 is performance.

Lightbloom looks slightly diferant, most notably the removal of the bloom reflection shaped like an 'X'. Water has better reflections and wind affects the water. Also there are VC shadows.

None of them, apart from the bloom is really noticable in that shot, however, performance in DX10 can be 20% better, or even more with some configerations.

That's assuming is we have the hardware. Didn't someone mention at one point that we needed to have at least a GeForce 8800 series or equivalent in order to appreciate DX10?

[Slotback]

I think the real benefit in FSX with Dx10 is performance.

Lightbloom looks slightly diferant, most notably the removal of the bloom reflection shaped like an 'X'. Water has better reflections and wind affects the water. Also there are VC shadows.

None of them, apart from the bloom is really noticable in that shot, however, performance in DX10 can be 20% better, or even more with some configerations.

That's assuming is we have the hardware. Didn't someone mention at one point that we needed to have at least a GeForce 8800 series or equivalent in order to appreciate DX10?

You can also get crap-tacular DX10 videocards now for under 100$

[Ashar]

Quite frankly, I can't tell a difference :-/ :-/

DX10 is not going to suddenly make everything look ub3r cool ash, it should just give  performance boost and allow you have  a little more eye candy. all DX is is a software relationship to your hardware... (i think )

Eye candy=uber cool.....

[Jayhawk Jake]

Quite frankly, I can't tell a difference :-/ :-/

DX10 is not going to suddenly make everything look ub3r cool ash, it should just give  performance boost and allow you have  a little more eye candy. all DX is is a software relationship to your hardware... (i think )

Eye candy=uber cool.....

You are waaaay to picky.  I for one just want the performance boost so I can actually play FSX without crying

[evanatorx]

wow! you must have a fast graphix card! It says it's OVERSPEEDING in the corner!

[mrjake2002]

I have direct X 10 and my FS9 looks pretty much the same...

[Tweek]

That's assuming is we have the hardware. Didn't someone mention at one point that we needed to have at least a GeForce 8800 series or equivalent in order to appreciate DX10?

Well obviously. The same way that you'd need a DX9 card to have DX9.

[ThatOnePerson]

I have direct X 10 and my FS9 looks pretty much the same...

Because FS9 doesn't support DX10

[SubZer0]

Performance boost yay

[Ivan]

I think the real benefit in FSX with Dx10 is performance.

Dont have FSX but in World In Conflict the average framerate is about 5fps more while having far more smoke effects in benchmark mode