my view part 2
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:15 pm
Simviation Forums
Flight Simulator and other chat
https://forums.simviation.com/phpBB3/
my view part 2
https://forums.simviation.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=124057
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:15 pmRe: my view part 2
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:29 pmThat first one is just slammin'. 8-) 8-) 8-)
Re: my view part 2
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:29 pmBlimey Craig. 
These are excellent. You have excelled yourself. Well done that man! [smiley=thumbsup.gif]
These are excellent. You have excelled yourself. Well done that man! [smiley=thumbsup.gif]
Re: my view part 2
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:34 pmThanks guys.
I think some thanks and credit should go to the gentleman who lent me his lense for the day. To bad the photographer had the settings wrong,
I think some thanks and credit should go to the gentleman who lent me his lense for the day. To bad the photographer had the settings wrong,
Re: my view part 2
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:37 pmExcellent stuff! :o
100 - 400 mm L I suppose? I'd better never touh one of these, because my arsenal of lenses is costly as it is...
But pretty darn amazing shots mate! :)
100 - 400 mm L I suppose? I'd better never touh one of these, because my arsenal of lenses is costly as it is...
But pretty darn amazing shots mate! :)
Re: my view part 2
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:40 pm70-200mm L
I'll be honest its a bit out of my budget right now and while really good, I found the 200mm a bit restricting and needed the extra 100mm at times. But I wont complain. It saved some shots that would have been unusable with mine.
I also had a chance to use his 400mm L prime, but again just being 400mm was really restrictive. See the close-up's in my other thread.
I'll be honest its a bit out of my budget right now and while really good, I found the 200mm a bit restricting and needed the extra 100mm at times. But I wont complain. It saved some shots that would have been unusable with mine.
I also had a chance to use his 400mm L prime, but again just being 400mm was really restrictive. See the close-up's in my other thread.
Re: my view part 2
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 1:08 pm>:( >:( >:( >:( 
You said your shots were rubbish.......
Lovely tonka pic..... 8-) 8-)
.mic
You said your shots were rubbish.......
Lovely tonka pic..... 8-) 8-)
.mic
Re: my view part 2
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 1:13 pm10 out of 10 on the Tonka 8-)
Matt
Matt
Re: my view part 2
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 1:14 pm70-200mm L
I'll be honest its a bit out of my budget right now and while really good, I found the 200mm a bit restricting and needed the extra 100mm at times. But I wont complain. It saved some shots that would have been unusable with mine.
I also had a chance to use his 400mm L prime, but again just being 400mm was really restrictive. See the close-up's in my other thread.
I just invested in a 70-200 f2.8 Sigma... Canon makes such nice lenses, but they surely don't come cheap. For the price of the Canon 70-200 f2.8 L or 100-400 L, I have a f2.8 24-70 and f2.8 70 - 200 lens now. I needed them for my current shoots.
But the L's sure remain nice toys...
Re: my view part 2
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 2:19 pmThat Tonka shot is absolutely superb Craig, good shooting that man 8-)
Re: my view part 2
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:36 pmDitto to the above comments Craig, superb
Re: my view part 2
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:44 pmNice Craig......we're happy to see the fruits of your learnin' and labours......... 8-)
Re: my view part 2
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:13 amyou guys inspire me to do two things... 1. get a new camera...and 2. head to the UK for some spottin
Re: my view part 2
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:44 amFantastic shots by all three, what a great competition, I suggest you go again. I'm glad to see you got togethers for a fine day. Mark
Re: my view part 2
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:47 amJust to be a bit different Craig, I'll say they're all rubbish...
...not!
...not!