Flight Simulator and other chat
https://forums.simviation.com/phpBB3/
https://forums.simviation.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=123602
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 9:36 am
And another question, can you show the magnification of this lens. Ex a photo of the same area at 100 mm, 300 mm and at 400 mm. I'm dying to know what big a difference the extra 100 mm makes...
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 9:39 amPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:20 am
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:22 amMic, the 300mm is terrible compared to the others. You needed a tripod...
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:26 am
makes me wanna throw my stuppid camera against the wall , and it Kodak , Im so regret the quality is so poor , I didn't knew too much about digital camerasPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:50 amPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:52 am
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:52 amMic, the 300mm is terrible compared to the others. You needed a tripod...
What's really ironic is that it was taken from a tripod with a remote shutter release....ummm...maybe the wind did it ::)
.mic
There is a definat hint of blur in that one! Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:10 amPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:15 amThanks Mic, this really give an idea. And I'm not going to pick on you! ;D
No really, I'm dying to know if I'll be pleased with the reach of my 300 mm at Brussels...
Now if I only could find a bleedn' sunhood... no retailer has those in stock for my lense. Well excuse me if i didn't buy an L-lense! >:( ;D
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:43 pmPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:58 pmNo really, I'm dying to know if I'll be pleased with the reach of my 300 mm at Brussels.
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:10 pmNo really, I'm dying to know if I'll be pleased with the reach of my 300 mm at Brussels.
300 is fine, I used it for two years without any real trouble, I got the 400 for it's far better quality more than the extra 100mm.
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:26 pmNo really, I'm dying to know if I'll be pleased with the reach of my 300 mm at Brussels.
300 is fine, I used it for two years without any real trouble, I got the 400 for it's far better quality more than the extra 100mm.
Were you using the converter with the 300mm?
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:27 pmNo really, I'm dying to know if I'll be pleased with the reach of my 300 mm at Brussels.
300 is fine, I used it for two years without any real trouble, I got the 400 for it's far better quality more than the extra 100mm.
Were you using the converter with the 300mm?
Nope, before I got the 400 I was using an 80-200 with a converter and before that a 75-300 (no converter with that, obviously!).