Page 1 of 2

For all who thought Mr Hadlow's lens was big

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 5:24 am
by Mictheslik
Check out this guy's.......all the people around him couldnt help lauging when he pulled out this whopper.
Image
(not fully extended.....yep its a 600mm)
;D ;D

.Mic

Re: For all who thought Mr Hadlow's lens was big

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 5:34 am
by ozzy72
The biggest lens I have is a 300 and I get strange looks with that! People here would die of shock if they saw that monster!!!!

Re: For all who thought Mr Hadlow's lens was big

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 5:59 am
by FLYING_TRUCKER
Would that not be made to put on a "Tripod"?

It would seem rather bulky and awkward to shoot with at moving targets however I am not a camera owner and know nothing about camera''s.

Would that be the largest hand held lense to shoot with?

Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug

Re: For all who thought Mr Hadlow's lens was big

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:18 am
by Tweek

Re: For all who thought Mr Hadlow's lens was big

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:12 am
by beaky
When the lens costs more than the camera, then, at last, you are a true aviation photographer.  ;D
I see these monsters at every airshow... from my limited experience with my small, inadequate 400mm, I can say that it's not impossible to shoot moving subjects by hand with a super-long lens, if you can use a high shutter speed. But it ain't easy.
Seeing as how a lens like this is also very wide, which means it can also gather a great deal of light ("longer= stronger; wider=brighter"), you can get away with higher shutter speeds in less-than-perfect lighting conditions.

Re: For all who thought Mr Hadlow's lens was big

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:13 am
by EGNX
Do you think he's trying to compensate for something...  ;) 8)

Re: For all who thought Mr Hadlow's lens was big

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:39 pm
by flymo
wow thats big, and he must be compensateing for something.

but that one in tweeks link. its a perverts camera. no other possible explanation

Re: For all who thought Mr Hadlow's lens was big

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:59 pm
by Tweek
but that one in tweeks link. its a perverts camera. no other possible explanation


Could be used for wildlife photography, or perhaps in a war zone, where it's far too dangerous to get close.

Re: For all who thought Mr Hadlow's lens was big

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:02 pm
by Ivan
That guy should get himself a MTO-11, 1000 mm zoom in a lot less length.

Re: For all who thought Mr Hadlow's lens was big

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 4:37 pm
by 61_OTU
Ok, now this guy was a wildlife photographer.....but still!

Image

Re: For all who thought Mr Hadlow's lens was big

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 4:40 pm
by EGNX
Ok, now this guy was a wildlife photographer.....but still!

Image


Hmmm wildlife.... you can see more than wildlife with that thing.... ::) ( . Y . ) Lol Sorry!

Re: For all who thought Mr Hadlow's lens was big

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:36 pm
by Alonso
[quote]

Hmmm wildlife.... you can see more than wildlife with that thing.... ::)[s]

Re: For all who thought Mr Hadlow's lens was big

PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 2:44 am
by Ivan
I wouldnt take that last one along for aircraft spotting... someone might see it as a Stinger launcher

Anyway, does he have a remote shutter and viewfinder on that (it seems so)

Re: For all who thought Mr Hadlow's lens was big

PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:22 am
by F3Hadlow
As I've already said quite a few times that cream lens you see on my pic is no longer with me, and I don't use a cream lens anymore and it is nothing special as far as focal length or size goes ::) ;)

Think you'll find that's a prime lens and the quality will be brilliant from it with it being L glass, but I wouldn't use one that large due to the weight and size making it difficult to handle for a full pass. Don't see why it's a laughing matter though, with the distant display line at DX you need something like that...

Re: For all who thought Mr Hadlow's lens was big

PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:33 am
by Hagar
Don't see why it's a laughing matter though, with the distant display line at DX you need something like that...

Indeed. Not only Duxford either as the display line at the big air shows seems to get further away every year.