How's this SLR?

Your Aviation (or Personal) Photos and discussion on Cameras & photography.

How's this SLR?

Postby AMDDDA » Sun Oct 12, 2008 6:03 pm

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6830113086

I need a new camera, this 6.0 MP one has digital noise (lots of it) even at an ISO of 80, and it has a scratched up lens.

I really need an SLR under 600$, too, is that one I posted a link to good?
User avatar
AMDDDA
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 975
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: How's this SLR?

Postby MWISimmer » Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:19 pm

....and it has a scratched up lens....



Don't go near it, that's a knackered camera
MWISimmer
 

Re: How's this SLR?

Postby ThatOnePerson » Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:22 pm

CD, I think he meant his old camera has a scratched up lens. I believe the one he posted is the nikon competitor to the canon rebel? Ive had no problems with my rebel so hopefully the nikon will be a good one as well.
Image

"Float like Pissed-Off Butterfly, Sting like Bad-Ass Bee."
ThatOnePerson
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1854
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: The Blue Planet

Re: How's this SLR?

Postby AMDDDA » Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:31 pm

....and it has a scratched up lens....



Don't go near it, that's a knackered camera

Yeah, I meant my old one  ;D
User avatar
AMDDDA
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 975
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: How's this SLR?

Postby MWISimmer » Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:36 pm

oops, misunderstood that. sorry.
MWISimmer
 

Re: How's this SLR?

Postby Mictheslik » Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:37 pm

I'm a Canon man and would advise on an older rebel (350/400D) (or XT, XTi in the states) which you can pick up quite cheaply these days. You can even get a second hand 10D for circa $400 now....

The D40x is a good camera, just beware the AF system. This camera will only have AF if you buy lenses with a built in motor system.....i.e. the camera won't work with the whole Nikkor lens range (unlike the D80, or any of Canon's SLRs)

.mic
[center]Image
User avatar
Mictheslik
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5517
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:32 am
Location: Bristol, England

Re: How's this SLR?

Postby Mushroom_Farmer » Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:02 pm

Look to spend at least $600 for a good new digital SLR. If you go for auto stabilization and/or auto focus make sure it's built into the camera body and NOT the lens, the exception being if you don't plan on buying extra lenses.
Image

"We're just sitting here trying to put our PCjrs in a pile and burn them. And the damn things won't burn. That's the only thing IBM did right with it - they made i
User avatar
Mushroom_Farmer
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1633
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 11:54 pm
Location: Indiana, USA

Re: How's this SLR?

Postby BAW0343 » Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:35 pm

Look to spend at least $600 for a good new digital SLR. If you go for auto stabilization and/or auto focus make sure it's built into the camera body and NOT the lens, the exception being if you don't plan on buying extra lenses.



As far as I know stabilization is made in the lens only. Very few cameras have that built in to the body. And now with new models coming out many slightly older cameras can be bought new for less then $600.

As I side note I think I prefer the older models such as the Rebel XTi and XT series because of all these new models coming out with video recording and many features you would find in a bridge camera. They are making the bridge more like the SLR's and the SLR's more like the bridge cameras. Soon the only thing making them different is size and the ability to change the lens.


Anyway I am also a Canon guy and really have nothing against nikon but will always recommend Canon if someone asks.
Image Image
User avatar
BAW0343
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3011
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 4:26 am
Location: Mesa, AZ

Re: How's this SLR?

Postby Mushroom_Farmer » Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:21 pm

Yes, very few have stabilization built into the body. Pentax, Olympus, and Sony I know have it. BUT if it's built into the lens it has to be in every lens you buy in order to be available, which will get expensive.
 Image stabilization of any kind should be a feature to consider if you are in low-light situations that require longer exposures, take  telephoto shots of still objects, take picture indoors, or simply have naturally shaky hands.
 If the main use of the camera is to photograph fast moving objects, like aircraft, image stabilazation really isn't necessary.
 And yes, buying a used camera isn't a bad way to go. I bought all of mine used and have no regrets.
 Most importantly, pick a camera that feels comfortable in your hand.
Image

"We're just sitting here trying to put our PCjrs in a pile and burn them. And the damn things won't burn. That's the only thing IBM did right with it - they made i
User avatar
Mushroom_Farmer
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1633
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 11:54 pm
Location: Indiana, USA

Re: How's this SLR?

Postby Isak922 » Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:44 am

Last edited by Isak922 on Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
4GB DDR2 PC5300; 3.2GHz Pentium D 940, Nvidia 9800GT 1024MB DDR3, Windows XP Pro SP3
User avatar
Isak922
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1484
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:09 pm
Location: Connecticut

Re: How's this SLR?

Postby The Ruptured Duck » Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:09 am

Go for the Canon Xti.  It is an excellent camera that has served me very well.  Unfortunately there hasn't been the massive mark down that was predicted when the 450 came out, however you should be able to find one on amazon or another online shop for about $400-$500 with only the kit lens
"If you would not be forgotten, as soon as you are dead and rotten, either write things worth reading, or do things worth the writing" -Ben Franklin

"Man must rise above the Earth to the top of the atmosphere and beyond, for only
User avatar
The Ruptured Duck
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2282
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Wichita, KS


Return to Photos & Cameras

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 140 guests