More Tu-160.

Posted:
Sun Jun 24, 2007 5:57 pm
by Mees
Re: More Tu-160.

Posted:
Sun Jun 24, 2007 10:54 pm
by matt2190
That does not look even remotely like the B-1.

Re: More Tu-160.

Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:26 am
by john_uk
Is it supposed to then?
the russians are like microsoft, never had an origional idea in their life

(a few exceptions but you get what im sayin

)
Re: More Tu-160.

Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:48 am
by Souichiro
Mees, not that I dislike these shots but I know you can do a lot better!

She is a beauty though

Re: More Tu-160.

Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2007 5:17 am
by Tweek
That does not look even remotely like the B-1.

Straying a little, but you must be mad!
B-1BTu-160Top down/underside views are virtually identical!
Tu-160 looks better, anyway. 8-)
Re: More Tu-160.

Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2007 5:53 am
by yaarpanjabi
The tupelov is more complex, twice as fast and holds a lot more payload than the B-1. The B-1 was introduced in 1986, the Tupelov in 1987. I doubt you can call it a "copy" as such (its a bit hard to copy a complete aircraft within a year :P)
As for Russians copying technology, Russian fighters have had 3D jet vectoring for decades before the US even attempted 2D thrust vectoring, I wonder who's copying? :P
By the way, that first and last shots are absolutely stunning!
Cheers
Re: More Tu-160.

Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:36 am
by ATI_7500
Exeption: AK-47?
Nope.
http://198.144.2.125/MG42/FULL/STG-44%201.jpg(First modern assault rifle. Now guess who invented and used it...)
Re: More Tu-160.

Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2007 10:12 am
by Mees
Mhmm, MP44, But which one of either is more widely used?

Re: More Tu-160.

Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2007 10:43 am
by spitfire boy
That does not look even remotely like the B-1.

Straying a little, but you must be mad!
B-1BTu-160Top down/underside views are virtually identical!
Tu-160 looks better, anyway. 8-)
I do believe he was being sarcastic.
Re: More Tu-160.

Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2007 10:45 am
by spitfire boy
Is it supposed to then?
the russians are like microsoft, never had an origional idea in their life

(a few exceptions but you get what im sayin

)
The russian language is pretty original (i.e. infuriatingly complicated). I should know. I just started learning it.
Re: More Tu-160.

Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:00 pm
by Tweek
Is it supposed to then?
the russians are like microsoft, never had an origional idea in their life

(a few exceptions but you get what im sayin

)
The russian language is pretty original (i.e. infuriatingly complicated). I should know. I just started learning it.
I do believe he was joking.

Re: More Tu-160.

Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2007 2:49 pm
by spitfire boy
Who was joking?
I really have started to learn russian!! I can't get a russian alphabet on this computer but I can type in english;
strasvooytye
means
hello
pronounced;
stras - vwie - tye
There you go. That's quite enogh brain excercise for me today.
