Simviation Forums

Awsome package, totally worth the money... 8-)!





Touching down...


At the gate...


...and this one is from FSX. I didn't even realize that the runway texture glitched up (the default one is showing through), but I like the angle a lot, so posting anyway...


Jeff

Holy cow pie! That's amazing!  :o

OMG!!! 1, 2 and 3 show the quality of the scenery: EXCELLENT!

I managed to get the scenery today (I love parents ) and it is the BEST scenery for FS9.  It is BETTER than FSX with better performance!  My frames were averaging 15 around TNCM and thats with sliders pretty much maxxed!

Has anyone else noticed the special beach effect on takeoff?  The sand kicks up in the jet blast!  It's SOOOOOOOOOOOOOO COOOOOOOOL!!!!!!!

I cant wait for the FSX version.  Its simply incredible.

It is BETTER than FSX with better performance!

Oh really?

thats some incredible scenery.

WHERE DID YOU GET THAT?

I want it NOW!

No but seriously...

- Kevin

I really like #1. It shows the awesome detail very well.

WHERE DID YOU GET THAT?

I want it NOW!

No but seriously...

- Kevin

Its flytampa kevin,

Im seriously thinking of purchasing this sometime this week,all the threads on it are bloody great......

**stuart goes to find his Visa

It is BETTER than FSX with better performance!

Oh really?

I think its a safe statement.  The only things that FSX have that this scenery doesn't is nicer water, light bloom, and self shadows.  On my computer FSX runs at 15 FPS in default scenery with medium settings, but I can run flytampa at high settings with FS9 and average 15 and a little more most of the time

I think its a safe statement.  The only things that FSX have that this scenery doesn't is nicer water, light bloom, and self shadows.  On my computer FSX runs at 15 FPS in default scenery with medium settings, but I can run flytampa at high settings with FS9 and average 15 and a little more most of the time

That just says you got a half-assed system...

...doesn't say anything about why FS9 version of TNCM is better

I think its a safe statement.  The only things that FSX have that this scenery doesn't is nicer water, light bloom, and self shadows.  On my computer FSX runs at 15 FPS in default scenery with medium settings, but I can run flytampa at high settings with FS9 and average 15 and a little more most of the time

That just says you got a half-assed system...

...doesn't say anything about why FS9 version of TNCM is better

OH NO I didn't mean the FS9 version of TNCM, I just meant FS9 in general.  Although I believe the FSX version doesn't include St Barths or Saba, so....

Get a decent PC, spend some more time with FSX and we'll talk again.

Get a decent PC, spend some more time with FSX and we'll talk again.

But see there is the issue.  FSX is not for the common person.  My PC is pretty crappy, but at least it can run FS9.  And I have spent time with FSX, but it's been filled with frustration.  I'm not saying that FSX sucks or anything, just that it isn't good if you can't run it.