Page 1 of 1
Is the model that bad?

Posted:
Fri Dec 16, 2005 10:47 pm
by Nexus
Re: Is the model that bad?

Posted:
Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:07 am
by ThatOnePerson
Lovin that chrome on the belly,looks good to me
Re: Is the model that bad?

Posted:
Sat Dec 17, 2005 3:52 am
by JackieAdkins
i think its a great looking model, if i had FS04 i would own it
Re: Is the model that bad?

Posted:
Sat Dec 17, 2005 5:23 am
by Ecko
It's nice, but it takes up 10-15 FPS MORE, than anything, I've ever seen in FS. And that SUCKS!
Re: Is the model that bad?

Posted:
Sat Dec 17, 2005 7:57 am
by Nexus
I have actually better performance than the 777 from PSS, so I'm not really complaining :D
Re: Is the model that bad?

Posted:
Sat Dec 17, 2005 8:42 am
by GeForce
I'm not keen on the chrome, but the model looks fine to me! Great shots as well Nexus

Re: Is the model that bad?

Posted:
Sat Dec 17, 2005 8:46 am
by Nexus
Oh, the chrome is my own reflection mapping, if you use the default "envmap" then you wont have the same result as the above :)
Re: Is the model that bad?

Posted:
Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:05 am
by Fitter
The model looks very good for me....And you are the right guy to test it

Gret shots
Re: Is the model that bad?

Posted:
Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:41 pm
by Mees
well, i think the nose looks ok but i don't like the main gear bogie, it's too straight down and too long you know

Re: Is the model that bad?

Posted:
Sat Dec 17, 2005 2:04 pm
by jrpilot
Looks good, I especially like teh wings and the dirt on them...the engines look good to.
Re: Is the model that bad?

Posted:
Sat Dec 17, 2005 2:12 pm
by Mees
I especially like teh wings and the dirt on them
well, that's only the quality of the textures

Re: Is the model that bad?

Posted:
Sat Dec 17, 2005 2:54 pm
by Nexus
well, i think the nose looks ok but i don't like the main gear bogie, it's too straight down and too long you know

well, they work like that. Once you're airborne the struts aren't compressed anymore which obviously makes the landing gear look taller. 8)