Simviation Forums

That looks really cool!

Very nice.

Thanks a lot, Guyz!  :)

Now are you trying to tell me that there is no "Z" in treez? Of course there's a "Z" in it, just like in geeze, kneez and sneeze!  :D

[quote]Thanks a lot, Guyz!

Great job! You are improving quite rapidly.  ;)

Thank you very much, Gentlemen, both for the kind words and for the good humor!  :)

Aha! The 'one  with the wires'? Stunning, looks very well blended...

Thanks, krigl!  :)

The blending was the challenge! Might have done better had I messed with it longer... but then sometimes messing with it too much can ruin it! Tough to blend into such a beautiful image!

I tried darkening the shadow side, mostly the underside of the wings, but it seemed too "dead" that way. Finally decided to just light up the sunny side and let the shadow side simply be relatively darker.

The cables seem a little heavy and dark on the shadow side but better that way than "choppy". It was also an experiment. Wanted to see if I could emphasize the perspective and shadows by making the cables heavier and darker on that side. If you look at the wires near the underside of the rudder and elevators you'll notice that I left them lighter and thinner to try to add a sense of depth. Still need to fool around with it more in the future. Haven't done that many bipes so I'm still early in the learning curve with cables and wires!  :o

Great job, it blends almost perfectly 8-).

- Kevin

Oooops! Almost didn't notice the new comment!

Thanks a lot, Kevin! Much appreciated, M8!  :)

Well, I kept messing with the opacity. It seemed to "blend" better with the background at a slightly lower opacity but then it blended too well and the subject seemed to get lost, hee, hee! I finally took into consideration that it was relatively close to the point of view and that it would therefor be ok for it to have a bit more punch than the background.

Saturation was an issue as well. The roundels are pretty strong in terms of color so I didn't want to blast them too much. However, considering that the green ground cover is pretty saturated I thought that I could get away with this level of saturation, especially since the roundel in the shadow is much more subdued.

Well, at some point we have to cut it loose and say, "good enough". I find that if I stay with an image too long that I lose "intuitive" sensitivity to it and lose my way more and more as intellect takes over. You know, don't over cook the eggs, hee, hee!  ;)

Oooops! Almost didn't notice the new comment!

Thanks a lot, Kevin! Much appreciated, M8!  :)

Well, I kept messing with the opacity. It seemed to "blend" better with the background at a slightly lower opacity but then it blended too well and the subject seemed to get lost, hee, hee! I finally took into consideration that it was relatively close to the point of view and that it would therefor be ok for it to have a bit more punch than the background.

Saturation was an issue as well. The roundels are pretty strong in terms of color so I didn't want to blast them too much. However, considering that the green ground cover is pretty saturated I thought that I could get away with this level of saturation, especially since the roundel in the shadow is much more subdued.

Well, at some point we have to cut it loose and say, "good enough". I find that if I stay with an image too long that I lose "intuitive" sensitivity to it and lose my way more and more as intellect takes over. You know, don't over cook the eggs, hee, hee!  ;)

You know your not forced to reply to every comment you receive

Ah, yes, well then, not a word of reply shall you receive to your comment. Mum's the word. The slip of a lip can sink a ship!

An absence of reply shall prevail. The paper shall remain entirely blank, as it were. Not a key shall be pressed, from Alpha to Omega. Furthermore, nothing shall be written.

All thoughts which might have been put into written form shall be forthwith withheld. Any written reply to your comment shall be severely curtailed in the extreme following stringent rules of non-reply as set forth in Article 3, Subsection 2A, Paragrah 6, Line 14.

Where there might have been reply, absolutely nothing shall be found. The space shall be filled with conspicuous absence. Neither hide nor hair of reply shall be manifested therein.

In the area designated for reply, no reply shall be entered. The custom of reply shall be honoured entirely in the breach, as it were. Proselessness shall prevail.

Hahaha, that was great.  Is that a quote or original reply/lack of reply.  Sounds like monty python so i figured i'd ask.