Page 1 of 1

Mainly tubes

PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 7:18 pm
by krigl
More edits of shots from the archives.... August/Sept 2005... hope you enjoy

Re: Mainly tubes

PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 7:21 pm
by NDSP
Daaannnnnnnnnngg.... great edits as always  8-)

Re: Mainly tubes

PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:00 pm
by matt2190
You must have a lot of free time to take all those screenshots and then edit them. ;)

Re: Mainly tubes

PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:36 pm
by cloud9
There old shots but oh well... Love em Krigl ;)

Re: Mainly tubes

PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 6:19 am
by Cobra
I don't normally rate non composite edits, but  :o :o :o :o Yours are stunning, so artistic...all unique! Keep em' coming :)

Re: Mainly tubes

PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 6:38 am
by Sytse
Great stuff!  8-)

Re: Mainly tubes

PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 1:14 pm
by Immelman
Third from last and the last are amazing.

Re: Mainly tubes

PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 1:38 pm
by ATI_7500
Now you got the effect right!
Number seven looks very good!

But not as good as number three. Hell have you snuck a photo in here? :o

Re: Mainly tubes

PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 2:41 pm
by krigl
Thank you very much! I'm having a real editing binge right now!!!

Yes, they're old shots, but if I didn't say they were not many people would notice... ;)
Anyway, a pic of a 747  taken 2 years ago is  going to look the same as today... and it feels like just yesterday anyway  ;D
My comp is limping badly... upgrade in a month though. Until then expect lots of edits of old shots...

Now you got the effect right!
Number seven looks very good!

But not as good as number three. Hell have you snuck a photo in here? :o


Thanks! I  used exactly the same technique as for the other one though...  so what did I do right????
The third does look pretty  real, must be the combination of colours....

Cheers all for the feedback!

Krigl

Re: Mainly tubes

PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:50 am
by ATI_7500
Thanks! I  used exactly the same technique as for the other one though...  so what did I do right????


Well, the effect now fits the motion.
Fast -> slow...

Re: Mainly tubes

PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:21 pm
by krigl
[quote][quote]Thanks! I

Re: Mainly tubes

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:19 am
by ATI_7500
I guess with the reversers on, most of the exhaust gasses are emitted through the doors with only a little remainder coming out of the normal exhaust.

But don't take a bet on that and, more important, don't overdo the heat blur. An engine never uses 100% N1 to for the reversers, only 50-60% N1 at max.

Re: Mainly tubes

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:04 pm
by krigl
I guess with the reversers on, most of the exhaust gasses are emitted through the doors with only a little remainder coming out of the normal exhaust.

But don't take a bet on that and, more important, don't overdo the heat blur. An engine never uses 100% N1 to for the reversers, only 50-60% N1 at max.


So in that case, there should be heat blur spilling out and back from the reverser doors, and the area to the rear, and possibly even to the front (from this angle) of the engine should have some hear blur... right?  :-?

Re: Mainly tubes

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:00 pm
by ATI_7500
So in that case, there should be heat blur spilling out and back from the reverser doors, and the area to the rear, and possibly even to the front (from this angle) of the engine should have some hear blur... right?  :-?


It doesn't need any heat blur at all.

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1189147/L/

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1019803/L/

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0885046/L/

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0602851/L/

The only thing would be some water spray on a wet runway:

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0620490/L/


Bottom line for Airbus aircraft: Not needed.

The rest 'though...

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1155978/L/

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0740954/L/

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0975761/L/