Deltanada
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:05 pmToday's edits... 
Thanks for looking in!
Krigl
Thanks for looking in!
Krigl
! AWESOME Krigl! I love it 
.- Kevin
Simviation Forums
Flight Simulator and other chat
https://forums.simviation.com/phpBB3/
Deltanada
https://forums.simviation.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=103977
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:05 pmRe: Deltanada
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:28 pm#2 is amazing ! AWESOME Krigl! I love it .
- Kevin
! AWESOME Krigl! I love it .- Kevin
Re: Deltanada
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:33 pmAmazing edits krigl, especially number two :o !
!Re: Deltanada
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:07 amYes, no, no, yes, no.
Re: Deltanada
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:34 amGood shots. A little dark for my tastes
-Taters
-Taters
Re: Deltanada
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:26 pmYou have a 1280X1024 of #4....?..
Re: Deltanada
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 6:00 pm+1
I'd love a Hi-res version of number 4! ;D
Great edits man!!!
I'd love a Hi-res version of number 4! ;D
Great edits man!!!
Re: Deltanada
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 4:47 amThanks!
You're kidding! :o I'd say number two is one of my best edits ever..... but hey, different strokes for different fowkes...
no
You're kidding! :o I'd say number two is one of my best edits ever..... but hey, different strokes for different fowkes...
Re: Deltanada
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:41 amThe motion blur simply doesn't do the trick for me. Half of the pic looks like a screenshot of a rotating 744, half of it looks like a mediocre attempt at "motion blurring" a rotating 744.
There is no "whole" impression, just "non-blurred" - "blurred".
It would have been better to either blur the background or the whole airplane, not just half of it.
There is no "whole" impression, just "non-blurred" - "blurred".
It would have been better to either blur the background or the whole airplane, not just half of it.
Re: Deltanada
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:32 amThe motion blur simply doesn't do the trick for me. Half of the pic looks like a screenshot of a rotating 744, half of it looks like a mediocre attempt at "motion blurring" a rotating 744.
There is no "whole" impression, just "non-blurred" - "blurred".
It would have been better to either blur the background or the whole airplane, not just half of it.
'Mediocre'?
Re: Deltanada
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:36 amYou have a 1280X1024 of #4....?..
Thanks Splat and Mees, it's an honour that you'd like a copy...
I have an unedited pic of that size, or an edited pic of 900 by 720 or something similar which would probably look okay expanded....
Send me your email by pm if you'd like a copy.
Re: Deltanada
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 7:49 pm4 is awesome
Re: Deltanada
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 7:59 pmActually I'm going with K here! No2 Is bloody magnificent!
Re: Deltanada
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:38 amI think the plane is so close to the 'camera' or one's 'eye' that only part of it would be in focus...
It may work on real photos or in a real eye, but in a screenshot, in which every detail counts to recreate an impression that is as close as possible to reality, it simply does not work out at all.
I've seen and done other edits of the standard type....and I like experimenting. I'm not trying to be the best, just to get better and if not, to just have fun anyway :)
Thanks for clarifying, feedback is good, even negative.
Well, I'm not hindering you, just trying to give honest feedback.
