Mitsubishi launched!

Discussion on Specific Aircraft Types. Close up photos particularly welcome. Please keep ON TOPIC :)

Mitsubishi launched!

Postby chornedsnorkack » Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:48 am

See

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/20 ... t-mrj.html

The launch customer, ANA, wants 15 frames starting late in 2013. Mitsubishi offers to build planes as early as 2012 if any subsequent customers want them.

The plane itself can be seen at

http://www.mrj-japan.com/

Short specifics: cabin interior width 264 cm, wingspan 30,9 m.

This also launches Pratt and Whitney geared turbofan.
Last edited by chornedsnorkack on Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
chornedsnorkack
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 4:35 am

Re: Mitsubishi launched!

Postby DaveSims » Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:34 pm

CRJ, ERJ, and now MRJ.  Can't we get something original? ::)
User avatar
DaveSims
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2350
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 2:59 am
Location: Clear Lake, Iowa

Re: Mitsubishi launched!

Postby Slotback » Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:12 pm

I'm more interested in how this will work out. CRJ, ERJ, MRJ... who will get the most orders? Man... if only MDD was around, then we could have Boeing, Airbus  AND Douglas, that would be cool. :)

Also, I wonder how Pratts baby is coming along. I hope they make an engine as successful as the JT8D. :)
Slotback
 

Re: Mitsubishi launched!

Postby tcco94 » Mon Jul 14, 2008 3:25 pm

Wow,
I wanna fly in that plane  :D!
User avatar
tcco94
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 1:41 am
Location: Bay Area, California

Re: Mitsubishi launched!

Postby DaveSims » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:43 pm

I wonder if Lockheed would every try a commercial aircraft again.
User avatar
DaveSims
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2350
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 2:59 am
Location: Clear Lake, Iowa

Re: Mitsubishi launched!

Postby chornedsnorkack » Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:11 am

The plane seems changed a bit. Wingspan is 29,7 m now.
chornedsnorkack
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 4:35 am

Re: Mitsubishi launched!

Postby AMDDDA » Wed Aug 20, 2008 8:01 am

To just prove how origional Mitsubishi is, go look for pics of their F-2, it looks amazingly similar to something we have.
User avatar
AMDDDA
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 975
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Mitsubishi launched!

Postby Rich H » Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:38 pm

Don't forget the Sukhoi Superjet 100!
Image

"Politics" is made up of two words, "Poli", which is Greek for "many", and "tics", which are blood sucking insects. - Gore Vidal
User avatar
Rich H
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2017
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:40 am
Location: Solihull, U.K.

Re: Mitsubishi launched!

Postby Slotback » Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:14 am

To just prove how origional Mitsubishi is, go look for pics of their F-2, it looks amazingly similar to something we have.

The F-2 was never designed to be a new aircraft - it IS essentially a Japanese assembled F-16.... 40% of the work is done by Lockmart... With that logic we could call Boeing un-original for the Super Hornet, 737NG, 747-400, 747-800... or, Lockheed Martin unoriginal for the SR-71, & IDF Block 52+ F-16s. Oh yeah, you could also add India, Australia to the list, as they have indigenously assembled the Su-30 & F-18 respectively.
Last edited by Slotback on Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Slotback
 

Re: Mitsubishi launched!

Postby specter177 » Mon Oct 06, 2008 5:52 pm

Who else made the SR-71?
ImageImage
User avatar
specter177
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1369
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 2:33 pm
Location: KDAY

Mitsubishi RJ late, lost composite wing!

Postby chornedsnorkack » Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:37 pm

See:

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/20 ... ramme.html

The plane remains unfrozen for another ten months, and EIS is delayed into 2014. Composite wing is dumped and replaced by aluminum one. The fuselage is also changed, expanding cabin height from 198 to 204 cm and width from 269 to 276 cm. A stretch variant shall be added.
chornedsnorkack
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 4:35 am

Re: Mitsubishi launched!

Postby EJW » Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:27 am

Looks surprisingly good!
EJW
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2760
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 7:06 am
Location: Lincolnshire, UK

100 more sold!

Postby chornedsnorkack » Sat Oct 03, 2009 4:33 am

TSA ordered 100 MRJ-s, of all 3 lengths:
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/20 ... -mrjs.html
chornedsnorkack
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 4:35 am

Re: Mitsubishi launched!

Postby BFMF » Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:26 pm

I wonder if Lockheed would every try a commercial aircraft again.


How about Ford...?..lmao...;D
Last edited by BFMF on Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
BFMF
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 16266
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 6:06 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Mitsubishi launched!

Postby expat » Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:22 pm

I wonder if Lockheed would every try a commercial aircraft again.


How about Ford...?..lmao...;D



They got it right the first time around with the Tri-motor. After that there was no point in continuing ;D

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....


Return to Specific Aircraft Types

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 226 guests