The Boeing 787

Discussion on Specific Aircraft Types. Close up photos particularly welcome. Please keep ON TOPIC :)

The Boeing 787

Postby BrandonF » Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:42 pm

Do you like the 787 or not. ::) I really like it. It looks like it will be successful once Boeing can get it flying. (If they ever do! ;D)
BrandonF
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2288
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:37 pm

Re: The Boeing 787

Postby Layne. » Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:19 pm

It looks good but i am not sure about the cockpit
Windows 7 Ultimate x64 | 22" LED Monitor (1920x1080) | AMD Phenom II x4 970 Black Edition~3.5Ghz | 4gb RAM | ATI Radeon 6850 1gb | 1Tb HDD

[img]http://www.simviation.com/phpupload/uploads/1302666610.
User avatar
Layne.
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2646
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 9:17 pm
Location: Australia, Victoria, Melbourne

Re: The Boeing 787

Postby expat » Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:46 am

The company I work for has ordered 25. I will reserve judgement until I have spannered on it for a while ;D

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: The Boeing 787

Postby EJW » Sun Aug 16, 2009 9:11 am

It looks really nice, but it's not THE nicest Boeing. The 757 will always be #1 in my mind. :)
EJW
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2760
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 7:06 am
Location: Lincolnshire, UK

Re: The Boeing 787

Postby OVERLORD_CHRIS » Wed Aug 19, 2009 5:21 pm

Only thing I don't like is how Boeing says, the plane is state of the Art but they still have the Wright Brothers Yoke in the flight deck.

They use a Fly By Wire Joystick on the Yoke bottom on the C-17 that they have been building since 1987, and said because it has the force feed back, and motors that work in auto pilot that the system could be certified to work with any of there fly by wire designs, but yet they don't.

It's nearly 2010 with digital every thing, and yet the 1903 yoke is still in these aircraft. It's not the 50's any more where 100% of the flight controls had pulleys and cables that ran to and from the Flight deck vie the yoke.  Airbus took a big risk, with the side stick, but man does it safe on space. Even the Embraer modified the yoke some bit so it was not the same, I forget which plane, but they have the yoke coming out the side twords the middle, so the air crew have more space, and it looks neater.
Image
User avatar
OVERLORD_CHRIS
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1136
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:56 am
Location: Chalreston SC

Re: The Boeing 787

Postby Hagar » Wed Aug 19, 2009 5:44 pm

Only thing I don't like is how Boeing says, the plane is state of the Art but they still have the Wright Brothers Yoke in the flight deck.

Not sure what they mean by that. The Wright Brothers didn't use a yoke. Their aircraft were controlled by levers & a hip cradle for the roll axis.
Last edited by Hagar on Wed Aug 19, 2009 5:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30853
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: The Boeing 787

Postby specter177 » Wed Aug 19, 2009 7:24 pm

Also, they did that because the 777 has a yoke, and the 787 was designed to require the absolute minimum cross training.
ImageImage
User avatar
specter177
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1369
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 2:33 pm
Location: KDAY

Re: The Boeing 787

Postby The-Black-Sheep » Sat Aug 22, 2009 6:28 pm

Ugly as hell...well, the front is anyway. It looks like a 1950's futuristic jet conception. It's almost as bad as the A380!

The wing design looks pretty cool though.

It seems that it could be quite a successful aircraft. Will have to see how the A350 copes with it when it gets rolled out

Alec
FAC: "It sounds pretty bad"

Jerry Shriver: "No, no. I've got 'em right where I want 'em - surrounded from the inside."

Jerry M Shriver - M.I.A 24th Arpil 1969, Cambodia
User avatar
The-Black-Sheep
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 364
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 3:05 pm
Location: South Wales

Re: The Boeing 787

Postby OVERLORD_CHRIS » Sun Aug 23, 2009 10:19 pm

Also, they did that because the 777 has a yoke, and the 787 was designed to require the absolute minimum cross training.


Excuses, is that what they are going to say in 2025, when they make the new plane, "well we made it so you could come over from the 787 to the 7XX more easily" like how the 777 before it, and the 767, 757, 747, 737, 727, B-52, B-17. They need to put in a joystick of some sort, after all it is going to be a new generation of pilots flying, not ex WWII pilots that can't adapt to modern technology.

I'm just saying that not having a yoke is both a weight saver, and is proven in fighter jets and the C-17, so they can be used easily on heavies. The pilots that fly both the C-17, and commercial jets say it does not take that long to get used too.

Also for safety it is easier to exit the flight deck during an emergency, less equipment in the way, and your knees can slide out with out hitting any thing.  
Image
User avatar
OVERLORD_CHRIS
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1136
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:56 am
Location: Chalreston SC


Return to Specific Aircraft Types

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 212 guests