by RaptorF22 » Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:35 pm
Some of that may be true, but a satellite's path can be predicted quite reliably; the enemy knows when to hide their trucks and scuds.
On the other hand, a stealth mach 6+ high altitude spy plane can not be tracked, jammed, or shot down. And it provides just as good, if not better intelligence.
And don't start suggesting UAVs either. With a UAV, the pilot sits at a video-game like console hundreds if not thousands of miles away and has hardly any situational awareness and no sense of danger. The enemy starts firing SAMs at the UAV, and if the pilot even knows about it at all, he can't/won't do anything about it because he hasn't the least sense of fear. The pilot's CO smacks him for losing a multi-million dollar UAV, and they send another one up. Valuable time, money, and intelligence are lost, that is not good in a war.
Now with a manned spy plane the pilot will do anything and everything possible to keep that SAM from hitting his plane, or else he is dead meat.
In my mind there will always be a place for manned spy planes in the sky and above the battlefield.