Which is better?

Discussion on Specific Aircraft Types. Close up photos particularly welcome. Please keep ON TOPIC :)

Re: Which is better?

Postby a1 » Tue Apr 01, 2008 7:47 pm

The P-51 was ment to replace the Spitfire so if you look at that only info the P-51 would be better. But yes I would prefer a P-38 over those two. P-38s are faster and have more firepower.
Image
790i : QX9650 : 4Gb DDR3 : GeForce 8800 GTX : 1 WD Raptor : 1 WD VelociRaptor 150
User avatar
a1
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 7608
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:16 pm

Re: Which is better?

Postby C » Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:46 am


The P-51 was ment to replace the Spitfire


It was meant to do no such thing. As my previous post said, it came out of an RAF wish to acquire licence built P-40s to supplement British aircraft (remembering that in 1940 British aircraft production was at full capacity).

The Spitfire was continually developed as required - remember at the time of the P-51's genesis the MkII Spit was the latest; and they went up to the Mk22 postwar... ;) If anything the Hurricane would be more in need of replacing - and the last of those left the production line in 1944!
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Which is better?

Postby p-51mustangfanatic » Wed Apr 02, 2008 7:03 am


The P-51 was ment to replace the Spitfire


It was meant to do no such thing. As my previous post said, it came out of an RAF wish to acquire licence built P-40s to supplement British aircraft (remembering that in 1940 British aircraft production was at full capacity).

The Spitfire was continually developed as required - remember at the time of the P-51's genesis the MkII Spit was the latest; and they went up to the Mk22 postwar... ;) If anything the Hurricane would be more in need of replacing - and the last of those left the production line in 1944!


The problem i find with the soit is that they hd soo many differnet varients that it is as if they couldn't get it right and had to keep changing it! were as the mustang it was develped from being the A type to the H type (with other wierd varients)

Overall to me the mustang is better due to secifications such as speed manueverbility and g loads also visibilty was better and the undercarrage was far better due to it being wide track!
Image
User avatar
p-51mustangfanatic
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:29 pm
Location: England

Re: Which is better?

Postby C » Wed Apr 02, 2008 11:42 am


The problem i find with the soit is that they hd soo many differnet varients that it is as if they couldn't get it right and had to keep changing it! were as the mustang it was develped from being the A type to the H type (with other wierd varients


The Spitfire evolved along with the continued development RR Merlin (you needed quite a different airframe to hold a 1600hp Merlin, when the basic Merlin at the start of the war developed 1030hp!), and then the Griffon (major airframe changes due to a huge leap in power and a major change in balance due to the size of the engine), not because of the design "not being right". Most of the major Mk changes were due to new engines being available (I & II to V; V to IX; IX to XII then XIV; XIV to 21 and 22).

By the time the RR/Packard Merlin made it into the P51 (remembering at the time, with reference to your point below about visibility, the Mustang was the high backed B/C), the Spit was already almost at its definitive Mk with the Merlin (Mk IX). You also make the point above that the Mustang itself had several variations - with the H model being quite a lot different to the poorly-engine P51A

Overall to me the mustang is better due to secifications such as speed manueverbility and g loads also visibilty was better and the undercarrage was far better due to it being wide track!


Yep, the wide track undercarriage is a nicety and certainly an advantage the RAF knew about. When the pressure of war was over, and Vickers-Supermarine developed the Spiteful, one of the main changes was a switch the a wide track u/c unit.

The Spit had a bubble canopy too, with the the Mk XVI (development of the IX), the XIV and all subsequent variants bar the XIX and 21. ;)

The Spit also had a useful naval career too (as the Seafire). Another example of its versatility. ;)
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Which is better?

Postby machineman9 » Wed Apr 02, 2008 1:30 pm

I think the Mustang has the edge in looks, but the Spitfire is much more of a classic.

Mustfire!
User avatar
machineman9
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4816
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:05 am

Re: Which is better?

Postby HawkerTempest5 » Wed Apr 02, 2008 2:34 pm

Ah, the eternal debate. How many times have we had this discussion then? ::) I happen to like the Mustang. If you needed a plane to take you all the way to Berlin, have a scrap with a bunch of Fw190s and then shoot up a few trains on the way home just for good measure, the Mustang was your plane. However if we
Image
Flying Legends
User avatar
HawkerTempest5
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2883
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 3:09 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Which is better?

Postby C » Wed Apr 02, 2008 2:51 pm

I think the Mustang has the edge in looks,


Specsavers....

I think Ozzy has some work to do... ;D

But the P-47 could keep flying with a cylinder shot out


And could outrun anything in a dive. Shows what you can do if you have a 20ton lead engine on the front! ;D
Last edited by C on Wed Apr 02, 2008 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Which is better?

Postby p-51mustangfanatic » Thu Apr 03, 2008 5:36 am

Id like to ongratulate C on his fantastic field of kowledge o the spitfire!! ;) :)  Well done

I have loads of info on the mustang and would love to have a face to face debate with you lol! ;D
Image
User avatar
p-51mustangfanatic
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:29 pm
Location: England

Re: Which is better?

Postby pepper_airborne » Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:01 am

Hehe, interesting topic, offcourse, we all know that a ME-109 would blow both of em right out of the sky ;D.
User avatar
pepper_airborne
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2268
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 6:42 am

Re: Which is better?

Postby the invisibal man » Thu Apr 03, 2008 1:14 pm

i know this is nothing to do with topic but do you need to pay to use the fourm
User avatar
the invisibal man
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 5:38 am
Location: bournemouth

Re: Which is better?

Postby C » Thu Apr 03, 2008 2:08 pm

Hehe, interesting topic, offcourse, we all know that a ME-109 would blow both of em right out of the sky ;D.


Me109 doesn't, and never did exist... ;)
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Which is better?

Postby p-51mustangfanatic » Thu Apr 03, 2008 4:17 pm

Hehe, interesting topic, offcourse, we all know that a ME-109 would blow both of em right out of the sky ;D.


Me109 doesn't, and never did exist... ;)



well Messerschmit Bf-109 also called the ME 109
Image
User avatar
p-51mustangfanatic
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:29 pm
Location: England

Re: Which is better?

Postby C » Thu Apr 03, 2008 5:17 pm

Hehe, interesting topic, offcourse, we all know that a ME-109 would blow both of em right out of the sky ;D.


Me109 doesn't, and never did exist... ;)



well Messerschmit Bf-109 also called the ME 109



I was being pedantic... ;) ;D

Bf/ Me designations is one of my favourite subjects for inane pedantry. Mind you, I can never remember with which Messerschmitt it changed (although it was 15something or 16something) from Bf to Me. ;) ;D
Last edited by C on Thu Apr 03, 2008 5:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Which is better?

Postby p-51mustangfanatic » Fri Apr 04, 2008 5:40 am

Hehe, interesting topic, offcourse, we all know that a ME-109 would blow both of em right out of the sky ;D.


Me109 doesn't, and never did exist... ;)



well Messerschmit Bf-109 also called the ME 109



I was being pedantic... ;) ;D

Bf/ Me designations is one of my favourite subjects for inane pedantry. Mind you, I can never remember with which Messerschmitt it changed (although it was 15something or 16something) from Bf to Me. ;) ;D


He he! ;D

Dosen't matter we both know that the Bf-109 could most definatley be absolutley obliterated by either the spitfire or the mustang!!! ;D ;D ;)
Image
User avatar
p-51mustangfanatic
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:29 pm
Location: England

Re: Which is better?

Postby p-51mustangfanatic » Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:11 am

LOL! judging by the rsult no one can decide on which is better!!!!! ;D
Image
User avatar
p-51mustangfanatic
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:29 pm
Location: England

PreviousNext

Return to Specific Aircraft Types

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests