The Bell X-1 - Also known as the Miles M.52

Discussion on Specific Aircraft Types. Close up photos particularly welcome. Please keep ON TOPIC :)

The Bell X-1 - Also known as the Miles M.52

Postby mrjake2002 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:21 am

Hello.

As I'm sure some of our British members will know, the Bell X-1 was pretty much a rip-off of the Miles M.52.

Air Ministry specifications called for an aeroplane capable of flying more than twice as fast as any existing aircraft. At the time, no aeroplane had ever exceeded the sound barrier though there were unconfirmed reports of Spitfires and Mustangs going through the sound barrier in steep dives1.

Dubbed the Miles M.52, the secret aircraft would be designed for a speed of 1,000mph, with the ability to climb to 36,000 feet in 1.5 minutes.

In 1946 a team of American engineers from Bell Aviation visited the top-secret research facility of the Miles Aircraft company. The British government instructed the company to co-operate fully with the Americans, in return for data on the United States' own supersonic programme.

It is known that the Bell company had been having serious problems with control of their aircraft as it approached the sound barrier. The Miles team had overcome this snag with a completely new idea - the all-flying tailplane.

Basically, up until then, the horizontal tailplanes of all aircraft had been fitted with small flaps on their trailing edges to aid with vertical stability. The all-flying tailplane did away with these flaps, which were just not large enough to counteract the enormous forces encountered at supersonic speeds, and designed an aircraft where the entire horizontal tailplane pivoted, thus giving a much greater movable surface area with which to control the vertical pitch of the aircraft. This was a significant breakthrough, in fact Chuck Yeager is on record as saying that the single most significant contribution to the final success of the Bell XS-1 was the all-flying tailplane.

Within a few weeks of the American's visit, the Air Ministry Director of Scientific Research, Sir Ben Lockspeiser, cancelled the British supersonic project, saying:

   ...in view of the unknown hazards near the speed of sound ... [it is] considered unwise to proceed with the full-scale experiments.

Despite 90% of the design work being completed and half of the construction finished, the project fell, apparently due to a Treasury savings measure.

The Air Ministry ordered Miles to break up all jigs6 and to send all their design data to Bell Aviation. As it seems likely that the M.52 would have been flying by the summer of 1946, and since it would most likely have achieved its specified performance, it is hard not to believe the British government was pressured by the Americans to cancel the M.52 project.

This allowed the US become the first 'through the barrier', in October 1947, using the rocket-powered M.52 lookalike, the Bell XS-1. As an added bonus, the Americans' first jet engine, the General Electric Type 1, drew heavily on the designs of the British jet.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A882272

The Americans refused to give the British their designs (as per the agreement) and hastily modified the X-1 to include the tailplane.


I've only known about this for a while and was shocked to see that the wikipedia page on the Bell X-1 (and many others, for that matter) does not include even a small note that the all moving tailplane was in fact a British design - first tested on a Miles Falcon in 1943.

Now what really gets to me, is that I've been trying to add in a small note on the wikipedia page just mentioning that the all-moving tailplane (surely a particularly important development in supersonic design?) was a design by the Miles team. That's fair, right? Surely people should get recognition for their work?
[url]http://www.flickr.com/gravityxgrace[/url]
mrjake2002
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2243
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 4:42 am
Location: Cornwall, UK.

Re: The Bell X-1 - Also known as the Miles M.52

Postby Hagar » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:52 am

Make sure of your facts first Jake. I knew a lot of people involved with Miles Aircraft including my brother-in-law & late father-in-law. Being brought up within a stone's throw of Shoreham Airport where the company was based I've been an admirer of this talented family of aircraft designers since I was a young boy. A lot of bad feeling was caused by the sudden cancellation of the M.52 project & the company being compelled to give all its research data to the USA. I've read that this data was sent to Bell Aviation & other interested US companies. It's quite likely that they did in fact 'borrow' the idea of the all-flying tailplane or stabilator for the Bell X-1.

However, it's debatable who was responsible for the all-flying tailplane. The idea of all-moving flying surfaces is as old as manned flight itself. The Wright Flyer had a an all-moving fore plane which worked on the same principle, as did the Bristol Boxkite & other similar flying machines. Here's a photo of the Boxkite replica operated by the Shuttleworth Collection which was coincidentally built by Miles Aircraft Ltd for the film "Those Magnificent Men" http://www.military-aircraft.org.uk/other-military-aircraft/bristol-boxkite.htm

Several WWI types featured a conventional all-flying tailplane including the Fokker E.III that first appeared in 1915. http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/album/showphoto.php?photo=12459
Nothing much is new in engineering or aviation.
Last edited by Hagar on Tue Sep 09, 2008 12:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30862
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: The Bell X-1 - Also known as the Miles M.52

Postby mrjake2002 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:37 pm

Make sure of your facts first Jake. I knew a lot of people involved with Miles Aircraft including my brother-in-law & late father-in-law. Being brought up within a stone's throw of Shoreham Airport where the company was based I've been an admirer of this talented family of aircraft designers since I was a young boy. A lot of bad feeling was caused by the sudden cancellation of the M.52 project & the company being compelled to give all its research data to the USA. I've read that this data was sent to Bell Aviation & other interested US companies. It's quite likely that they did in fact 'borrow' the idea of the all-flying tailplane or stabilator for the Bell X-1.

However, it's debatable who was responsible for the all-flying tailplane. The idea of all-moving flying surfaces is as old as manned flight itself. The Wright Flyer had a an all-moving fore plane which worked on the same principle, as did the Bristol Boxkite & other similar flying machines. Here's a photo of the Boxkite replica operated by the Shuttleworth Collection which was coincidentally built by Miles Aircraft Ltd for the film "Those Magnificent Men" http://www.military-aircraft.org.uk/other-military-aircraft/bristol-boxkite.htm

Several WWI types featured a conventional all-flying tailplane including the Fokker E.III that first appeared in 1915. http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/album/showphoto.php?photo=12459
Nothing much is new in engineering or aviation.


Many thanks for your information Doug!  :)

I was just irritated that the Americans seem to have completely overlooked the role that the British engineers had in this.  :-/
[url]http://www.flickr.com/gravityxgrace[/url]
mrjake2002
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2243
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 4:42 am
Location: Cornwall, UK.

Re: The Bell X-1 - Also known as the Miles M.52

Postby C » Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:38 pm

Sadly a lot of information passed both east and west from war torn Europe post war.

Eric "Winkle" Brown says his biggest regret was not being the first through the sound barrier. One can argue that the M.52 would have been a far more useful development tool too. Yes, the Bell X-1 and M.52 were broadly similar aerodynamically, but the M.52 would have been far more relevant as it used an afterburning jet, rather than rocket motors, which in military aeroplanes have had little use as primary powerplants over the 60 odd years since.
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: The Bell X-1 - Also known as the Miles M.52

Postby beaky » Tue Sep 09, 2008 8:39 pm

[quote]
I was just irritated that the Americans seem to have completely overlooked the role that the British engineers had in this.
Image
User avatar
beaky
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:00 am
Location: Shenandoah, PA USA

Re: The Bell X-1 - Also known as the Miles M.52

Postby Hagar » Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:03 am

I found this interesting article on the M.52 at the Museum of Berkshire Aviation website. http://museumofberkshireaviation.googlepages.com/high_speed_research.pdf

Note that the article was originally published in the October 1946 edition of The Aeroplane Spotter. This was not long after the project had been cancelled (in February 1946) but a whole year before Chuck Yeager broke the Sound Barrier in the Bell X-1 (14th October 1947). The "movable tailplane" is addressed as is the possibility of "some form of jet directional control". I think this proves that these ideas were not as revolutionary or secret as some people would have us believe.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30862
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: The Bell X-1 - Also known as the Miles M.52

Postby mrjake2002 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 10:06 am

I found this interesting article on the M.52 at the Museum of Berkshire Aviation website. http://museumofberkshireaviation.googlepages.com/high_speed_research.pdf

Note that the article was originally published in the October 1946 edition of The Aeroplane Spotter. This was not long after the project had been cancelled (in February 1946) but a whole year before Chuck Yeager broke the Sound Barrier in the Bell X-1 (14th October 1947). The "movable tailplane" is addressed as is the possibility of "some form of jet directional control". I think this proves that these ideas were not as revolutionary or secret as some people would have us believe.


A very interesting read.  :)
[url]http://www.flickr.com/gravityxgrace[/url]
mrjake2002
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2243
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 4:42 am
Location: Cornwall, UK.


Return to Specific Aircraft Types

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 218 guests