L-100 (C-130) Unpopularity

Discussion on Specific Aircraft Types. Close up photos particularly welcome. Please keep ON TOPIC :)

L-100 (C-130) Unpopularity

Postby Drake_TigerClaw » Sun Jul 09, 2006 3:20 pm

Does anyone know why C-130s are unpopular in the civilian market? It seems like it would make a great cargo ferry but there arent that many in civilian aviation. Are they too expensive to operate or just not suited to civi cargo? I mean you woud think that cargo services woulkd jump on it.
~Drake TigerClaw
Image
User avatar
Drake_TigerClaw
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 110
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: Atlanta, Ga, USA

Re: L-100 (C-130) Unpopularity

Postby flyboy 28 » Sun Jul 09, 2006 3:32 pm

There's no real need for them. Airlines are better off with more efficient designs, created solely for civilians. Examples for "competitors" to the L-100 would be the ATR family, ERJs etc.
User avatar
flyboy 28
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10264
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 4:01 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: L-100 (C-130) Unpopularity

Postby Ivan » Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:34 am

1: there arent many of these in civil hands to start with
2: lockheed civil sales werent great anytime

And the main reason: An-12s are cheaper (and havent been shot at usually, even if second-hand)
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

Re: L-100 (C-130) Unpopularity

Postby Drake_TigerClaw » Mon Jul 10, 2006 11:52 am

I think maybe its more along the lines of the fact that its the wrong size. Its a medium sized cargo plane which makes it too big and expensive for a small operation which would go for something like a DC-3 or a Cessna Caravan and too small for a big operation which would use a cargo version of a commercial liner like a DC-10.
~Drake TigerClaw
Image
User avatar
Drake_TigerClaw
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 110
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: Atlanta, Ga, USA

Re: L-100 (C-130) Unpopularity

Postby cheesegrater » Sun Jul 16, 2006 1:22 pm

The C-130 is more suitable for operation from small unequipped airfields. In modern airports newer aircraft are more efficient. In the 3rd world where the aircraft is suitable, Russian aircraft are cheaper. So there is a small market for the aircraft.
Last edited by cheesegrater on Sun Jul 16, 2006 1:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
cheesegrater
 

Re: L-100 (C-130) Unpopularity

Postby Felix/FFDS » Fri Jul 21, 2006 7:08 pm

Also, the airplane's own history is against it....  I mean, any "civilian" Hercules would immediately be seen as being part of Air America (wink, wink, nudge, nudge) ... just as Aeroflot was (still is?) a totally civilian enterprise.  (Note, I'm not complaining that Aeroflot was, in the grand scheme of things, part and parcel of the Soviet defence scheme, for me, it's a matter of fact)

However, for the civilian market, a well maintained An-12 (or similar) is probably more economical to operate (especially if it's not US registered)
Felix/FFDS
User avatar
Felix/FFDS
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 16776435
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 9:42 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: L-100 (C-130) Unpopularity

Postby Drake_TigerClaw » Sat Jul 22, 2006 1:22 am

Speaking of Air America there was a pilot named Rik Luytjes back in the 80's who owned a very successful aircraft modification company called Air America. But he smuggled a ton of coke in a modified Cessna 310, not a C-130.
~Drake TigerClaw
Image
User avatar
Drake_TigerClaw
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 110
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: Atlanta, Ga, USA

Re: L-100 (C-130) Unpopularity

Postby flyboy 28 » Sat Jul 22, 2006 9:36 pm

They made a movie about that, didn't they?
User avatar
flyboy 28
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10264
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 4:01 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: L-100 (C-130) Unpopularity

Postby Felix/FFDS » Sat Jul 22, 2006 10:08 pm

They made a movie about that, didn't they?


NO, the movie was about the CIA run Air America out of Thailand and Vietnam in the '60s.  Quite an interesting part of aviation history since most of the pilots were mostly ex-military, " soldiers of fortune", and the strict civilian regulation were niceties more often observed in their breach.
Felix/FFDS
User avatar
Felix/FFDS
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 16776435
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 9:42 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: L-100 (C-130) Unpopularity

Postby flyboy 28 » Sat Jul 22, 2006 10:13 pm

Ah, but it was titled Air America, no? Just to make sure I'm not losing my wits. :)
User avatar
flyboy 28
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10264
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 4:01 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: L-100 (C-130) Unpopularity

Postby beaky » Sun Jul 23, 2006 1:12 pm

Ah, but it was titled Air America, no? Just to make sure I'm not losing my wits. :)


Yes, but the movie was about the Air America that flew missions for "the company" (shhhh) in SE Asia; not the Air America that smuggled drugs.
Wait... now I'm confused... ;D
Image
User avatar
beaky
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:00 am
Location: Shenandoah, PA USA


Return to Specific Aircraft Types

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 538 guests