What Mk?

Discussion on Specific Aircraft Types. Close up photos particularly welcome. Please keep ON TOPIC :)

41Re: What Mk?

Postby Woodlouse2002 » Tue Jun 01, 2004 8:59 am

I think that ML417 is dressed as a Griffon spit in that photo. You can see the rocker cover bulges that shouldn't be there on a MkIX.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!

Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains c
User avatar
Woodlouse2002
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10369
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:51 pm
Location: Cornwall, England

Re: What Mk?

Postby HawkerTempest5 » Tue Jun 01, 2004 11:58 am

Woody pal, I'm not sure where you can see Griffon style bulges on that photo pal ??? I agree that the nose on ML417 looks a bit different from the nose in the first photo but I'm sure it's just the angle. I've seen ML417 twenty or thirty times and it has always looked like that.
One explanation however is that ML417 may have a Packard Merlin fitted or have the cowl from a MkXVI. The nose profile of the MkXVI was just slightly different form the MkIX due to small differences between the 60 series Merlin and the Packard V1650.
Image
Flying Legends
User avatar
HawkerTempest5
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2883
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 3:09 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: What Mk?

Postby ozzy72 » Tue Jun 01, 2004 12:18 pm

Its just the angle. ML417 had the Mosquito engine she was running removed when they did her big rebuild in the early 90's, she is now running a Merlin 60 ;)
Oh and the nose is the original I believe, its just the angle of the shot and the light I think is distorting things a tad.

Mark
Last edited by ozzy72 on Tue Jun 01, 2004 12:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
User avatar
ozzy72
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 33284
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 4:45 am
Location: Madsville

Re: What Mk?

Postby Woodlouse2002 » Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:58 pm

I have outlined what I am speaking of.
The original picture.
Image
Picture with the bulge on the engine cowl outlined.
Image

I really do think that ML417 is in drag for that pic.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!

Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains c
User avatar
Woodlouse2002
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10369
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:51 pm
Location: Cornwall, England

Re: What Mk?

Postby Felix/FFDS » Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:29 pm

I have outlined what I am speaking of.

I really do think that ML417 is in drag for that pic.


It got me thinking, too, but I compared photos - all Merlin Spitfires also have that "bulge".  Maybe it wasn't as pronounced in the I, II, and V, but the IX/XVI had it.  Granted, it was much more pronounce on the Griffon-engined marks

You can see it in this one, too.

Image
Felix/FFDS
User avatar
Felix/FFDS
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 16776435
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 9:42 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: What Mk?

Postby HawkerTempest5 » Wed Jun 02, 2004 6:54 am

Image
This is TFC's MkXIV. In this shiny colour scheme the Griffon rocker cover bulges stand out quite well and you can see just how big they are.
Image
ML417 clearly without big rocker covers bulges. The nose curves more and is wider behind the prop than on a MkV.
Image
Just for comparison, BBMF's LFIXe. You can see from this angle the nose profile is exactly the same as on ML417.
Image
Flying Legends
User avatar
HawkerTempest5
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2883
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 3:09 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: What Mk?

Postby Woodlouse2002 » Wed Jun 02, 2004 12:22 pm

Fair enough. I'm happy now. ;D
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!

Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains c
User avatar
Woodlouse2002
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10369
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:51 pm
Location: Cornwall, England

Re: What Mk?

Postby HawkerTempest5 » Wed Jun 02, 2004 1:34 pm

Fair enough. I'm happy now. ;D

That's what this foum is for pal, were all here to help each other. ;) I love these discussions  ;D
Image
Flying Legends
User avatar
HawkerTempest5
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2883
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 3:09 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: What Mk?

Postby xFLAMESx » Thu Jun 03, 2004 12:26 pm

WOW :o - all this from a little quiz.
Thanx anyhow - i didn't know half of the stuff i just learnt.

Thanx. Carl
Honours :
Freeware Screenshot Competition Winner, June 2009
User avatar
xFLAMESx
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1595
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 6:35 pm
Location: Torquay, England

Re: What Mk?

Postby Merlin66 » Tue Dec 21, 2004 7:53 pm

Griffon v's Merlin nose bumps.....
Another thing which is a dead give away is the joint line between the side panels and the rocker cover top panel.
On the Merlin the joint is ABOVE the exhausts, whereas on the Griffon it is BELOW the exhausts. Look again at the Photos in this post. See the difference!

The "circular" cross section just in front of the Canopy, where the fuel tank(s) resided, transitioned into a far "squarer" top above the engine, infact this shape change is the the thing to look for on accurate models of the Spitfire.
Merlin66
Merlin66
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 189
Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 10:51 pm
Location: Derrinal, Australia

Previous

Return to Specific Aircraft Types

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 236 guests