Another controversy, (this time about titanic)

Discussions on History. Please keep on topic & friendly. Provocative & one sided political posts will be deleted.

Another controversy, (this time about titanic)

Postby Viper22 » Tue Mar 14, 2006 3:50 pm

My other controversy theory I heard was that the Titanic was sunk by a German U-boat.  I only heard this briefly, and it could make sense since it was just before WWI.  Anyone know anymore about this?  (again this probably isn't true, just a theory)
Mess with the best, die like the rest.

Core 2 Duo E6600
Gigabyte 965 DQ6
2GB Mushkin DDR2 800
eVGA 7900 GT KO
250GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.10
Silverstone Zeus 750W
Thermaltake shark case modded with green fans and
User avatar
Viper22
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 7:37 pm
Location: CANADA

Re: Another controversy, (this time about titanic)

Postby Hagar » Tue Mar 14, 2006 6:24 pm

Not heard that one before. First, I have no reason to doubt that Titanic collided with an iceberg. There were enough eye-witnesses to confirm that.

Second, unless it was a terrible accident what possible reason would a German U-Boat have for sinking an ocean liner in peacetime?
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30862
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Another controversy, (this time about titanic)

Postby Viper22 » Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:45 pm

that's what confused me, but apparently the holes in the ship resemble a torpedo according to the experts ::)
Mess with the best, die like the rest.

Core 2 Duo E6600
Gigabyte 965 DQ6
2GB Mushkin DDR2 800
eVGA 7900 GT KO
250GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.10
Silverstone Zeus 750W
Thermaltake shark case modded with green fans and
User avatar
Viper22
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 7:37 pm
Location: CANADA

Re: Another controversy, (this time about titanic)

Postby RichieB16 » Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:31 pm

I really doubt that the Titanic was sunk by anything else then an ice berg.
Last edited by RichieB16 on Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
RichieB16
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3662
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 11:46 pm
Location: Oregon

~

Postby Scorpiоn » Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:24 pm

Replace "experts" with "dunce who can't figure out history so he's trying to get famous this way" and you got a case.

Experts... ::)

On par with saying a Global Hawk hit the Pentagon.
The Devil's Advocate.
Image
User avatar
Scorpiоn
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3734
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 7:32 pm
Location: The Alamo

Re: Another controversy, (this time about titanic)

Postby SilverFox441 » Wed Mar 15, 2006 2:41 am

You want a real controversy?

How about this...

There has been some real belief amongst some folks that Titanic didn't hit an iceberg...or sink in 1912. These folks believe that the ship that was lost was Titanic's older sister Olympic...after a little sleight of hand by the White Star Line. The belief is that Olympic was so badly damaged in it's collision with HMS Hawke in 1911 that it could not be fully repaired...and that it switched places with Titanic so that a full claim could be made.

http://www.titanic-titanic.com/conspira ... eory.shtml
Steve (Silver Fox) Daly
User avatar
SilverFox441
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 12:54 am
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Re: Another controversy, (this time about titanic)

Postby Hagar » Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:41 am

These folks believe that the ship that was lost was Titanic's older sister Olympic...after a little sleight of hand by the White Star Line.

Now that one I have heard before.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30862
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Another controversy, (this time about titanic)

Postby ozzy72 » Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:11 am

All these conspiracy BS mechants do my head in completely! Why can't they just accept the facts? ::) By the way I was the 648th gunman on the grassy knoll ::) ::) ::)
Image
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
User avatar
ozzy72
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 33284
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 4:45 am
Location: Madsville

Re: Another controversy, (this time about titanic)

Postby Ijineda » Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:29 am

the Titanic was sunk by a German U-boat


WUAHAHA! Always the evil Krauts! Probably germans were hijacking the 9/11-planes, and Saddam has german ancestors.

it was just before WWI


No it wasnt. The Titanic collided with the iceberg the 14th of April 1912, well 2 years before WWI.
Intel Quad Core 2 Extreme Q6600 @ 2.60GHz - Radeon HD 4850 - P5N-D - 4 GB RAM
Ijineda
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 875
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 8:36 am
Location: Vienna, Austria

Re: Another controversy, (this time about titanic)

Postby Felix/FFDS » Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:54 am


No it wasnt. The Titanic collided with the iceberg the 14th of April 1912, well 2 years before WWI.



Give it another hundred years and two years becomes "just before WW1" .. :)

The "submarine" conspiracy theory doesn't strike me as believable for several reasons:

I do not believe that the submarine technology of the time allowed for a European's submarine's operational are to extent to the western north Atlantic.

While there was a lot of sabre rattling going on (there was an effective naval arms race at the time), I do not believe that the overall political situation of the times would have sanctioned such an operation.  Submarines, at the time, were also viewed with suspicion, as being "ungentlemanly"  and more of a coastal defence weapon.
Felix/FFDS
User avatar
Felix/FFDS
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 16776435
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 9:42 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: Another controversy, (this time about titanic)

Postby Smoke2much » Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:32 am

What absolute rubbish!

You also have to ask yourself what the Imperial German Navy would have been trying to acheive?  If they wanted to take an early U-boat across the Atlantic they would have done so with a huge fanfare and a great deal of publicity.  As Felix said there was an arms race going on at the time so an ocean going submercible would have been a definate boast.  In addition war was by no means inevitable in 1912, it was likely but not certain.  The IGN would have had no desire to sink a ship full of civillians.  We may also view the Gentlemanly conduct of early last century with raised eyebrows and chuckle now but at that time it was deadly serious.  A German officer would not have stooped to sinking a merchant vessel without warning when no state of war existed.  Let alone a vessel with Ladies on board.  Early in the war Submarines were required to surface and hail the master of the merchant ship that they were attacking.  The master was then given the chance to surrender and he and his crew would abandon ship.  The submarine would sink the boat and on occasion give the food and water to help them survive their ordeal.  The Surface commerce raiders operated in the same manner but would take the crew prisoner and drop them off in a neutral port before returning to Germany.

When the Lusitania was sunk(7th May 1915) it was after the announcement of unrestricted sea warfare (Feb 1915) and in addition the German Embassy had issued warnings to citizens of neutral nations not to embark on British vessels as there was a danger of being sunk.

As a side note the US was eventually brought into the war as a result of a change in US public opinion over the deaths of 128 American Citizens on the Lusitania.  120,000 American servicemen subsequently died in Northern France from disease (60%) and enemy action.

Will
Who switched the lights off?
User avatar
Smoke2much
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2755
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Sittingbourne, Kent,

Re: Another controversy, (this time about titanic)

Postby Felix/FFDS » Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:52 am

[quote]
As a side note the US was eventually brought into the war as a result of a change in US public opinion over the deaths of 128 American Citizens on the Lusitania.
Felix/FFDS
User avatar
Felix/FFDS
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 16776435
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 9:42 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: Another controversy, (this time about titanic)

Postby Smoke2much » Wed Mar 15, 2006 10:21 am

Cool, I was generalising ;D  The Lusitania and the US in WW1 is the equivalent of the US civil war being all about slavery.

The Lusitania was not carrying millitary cargo, the second explosion was either the boilers or coal dust. She was a valid target due to the declaration of unrestricted submarine warfare.  Fair warning had been issued in February which was reiterated before she sailed.  Those who died with her knew the risks before they embarked, in my opinion.

Will
Who switched the lights off?
User avatar
Smoke2much
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2755
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Sittingbourne, Kent,

Re: Another controversy, (this time about titanic)

Postby RichieB16 » Wed Mar 15, 2006 10:28 am

The Lusitania was not carrying millitary cargo, the second explosion was either the boilers or coal dust.

Actually, the common belief is she was.  Although there is no proof to my knowledge, since the manifests did not have any military cargo on them (kind of a secret deal).  It is widely believed that she was carring some kind of military supplies.  Just because the secondard explosion was likely due to coal dust doesn't mean there were no military supplies on board.  Since the US was selling supplies to the allied nations in WWI, it is very likely that the Lusitiana was carring supplies.
User avatar
RichieB16
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3662
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 11:46 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: Another controversy, (this time about titanic)

Postby dcunning30 » Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:03 am

Actually, I'm convinced the Titanic was sunk by a doomsday cult as a sacrifice to the space aliens riding in Haley's comet's glow as it approaches earth in 1915.
TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE 34 RR THE WORLD WONDERS
User avatar
dcunning30
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:34 pm
Location: The Land of Nod

Next

Return to History

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 299 guests