Page 1 of 2

JFK

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:55 am
by ozzy72
Well 45 years ago today JFK was sworn in as the youngest US president ever (and I believe the only Roman Catholic one?).

Re: JFK

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:09 am
by Felix/FFDS
Obviously, he was placed in power by Opus Dei, and eliminated by the Illuminati!

Re: JFK

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:32 am
by WebbPA
Kennedy was the youngest elected.  T. Roosevelt was the youngest to serve.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy

Re: JFK

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:32 pm
by bbstackerf
In answer to part of your question, yes, he was and is still the only Roman Catholic ever elected President of the United States.


keni ;)

Re: JFK

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:33 pm
by Flt.Lt.Andrew
Yeargh! Me and the Freemasons had something to say about that!

We introduced him to Mr. B. Ullet...!!!

Hahahahahah!!

"I'm not through with a woman until I've had her three ways"  - not very Catholic and we're through with you!! Hahahahahahhaa...



A.

Re: JFK

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:34 pm
by beefhole
Yeah, many Americans still, to this day, have a very, very deep rooted resentment and dislike of Catholicism-not to mention the somehwat irrational fear that a Catholic president will be like the Pope controlling the US ::)

Re: JFK

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:08 pm
by Felix/FFDS
Yeah, many Americans still, to this day, have a very, very deep rooted resentment and dislike of Catholicism-not to mention the somehwat irrational fear that a Catholic president will be like the Pope controlling the US ::)


That's the same argument used against JFK (er.. the assasinated one, not the recently defeated one), and he turned out to be one of the most cherished Presidents of recent (post WW2).  I think that while there may be some concern, for all practical purposes politicans follow their own con$cience$ and idea$.

Of course, the advantage of an RC candidate for President is that he can raise the dead to vote for him (Chicago 1960)  heeeheee.

Re: JFK

PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:54 am
by H
Of course, the advantage of an RC candidate for President is that he can raise the dead to vote for him (Chicago 1960)  heeeheee.
Are you suggesting that's, in itself, the reason such a presidency is doomed to be short-lived? :-X

Re: JFK

PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 4:56 am
by ozzy72
Better to use voodoo and raise the dead than do a Mayor Daley ;)

Re: JFK

PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 10:28 am
by Felix/FFDS
Are you suggesting that's, in itself, the reason such a presidency is doomed to be short-lived? :-X



Won't know until it's tried again, eh?

Re: JFK

PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 4:27 pm
by RichieB16
Yeah, many Americans still, to this day, have a very, very deep rooted resentment and dislike of Catholicism-not to mention the somehwat irrational fear that a Catholic president will be like the Pope controlling the US ::)

I have never understood where that fear came from but it deffinately does exist.  Not only was JFK the only Roman Catholic President ever elected, he is one of only 3 to ever even have a major party nomination.

The only Roman Catholics to ever get a major party Presidential nomination were:

Al Smith (Democrat) - 1928: lost to Herbert Hoover
John F. Kennedy (Democrat) - 1960: won Presidency
John Kerry (Democrat) - 2004: lost to George W. Bush

Robert F. Kennedy would have certainly won the 1968 Democratic nomination had he not been assinated (and had a good chance to win the Presidency), but as it stands only 3 Catholics ever nominated by a major party.

Re: JFK

PostPosted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 3:00 am
by H
I have never understood where that fear came from but it deffinately does exist.  Not only was JFK the only Roman Catholic President ever elected, he is one of only 3 to ever even have a major party nomination.

The only Roman Catholics to ever get a major party Presidential nomination were:

Al Smith (Democrat) - 1928: lost to Herbert Hoover
John F. Kennedy (Democrat) - 1960: won Presidency
John Kerry (Democrat) - 2004: lost to George W. Bush

Robert F. Kennedy would have certainly won the 1968 Democratic nomination had he not been assinated (and had a good chance to win the Presidency), but as it stands only 3 Catholics ever nominated by a major party.

Just to inform since I have no intent to begin a viability argument here, having been acquainted with both realms. It's undoubtedly due to some of the old protestant (many of whom were victims of the great Inquistion) counterclaim that Rome, the seat of the Catholic Church, is the condemned apocryphal Babylon headed by the AntiChrist.

Re: JFK

PostPosted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 3:13 am
by ozzy72
the condemned apocryphal Babylon headed by the AntiChrist

Okay who let H into the Admin Forum? ;D

Re: JFK

PostPosted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 3:39 am
by H
Okay who let H into the Admin Forum? ;D
Ooew, if you knew the PM I just sent... or my association with the noncorporeal realm and the information thereof. 8)

Re: JFK

PostPosted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 4:10 pm
by beefhole
I have never understood where that fear came from but it deffinately does exist.

I can think fo two reasons of the top of my head-the original settlers in America who came to escape Catholic persecution (yeah, it actually is cited as a reason) and the severe resentment of the influx of Irish Catholics and other foreigners during the nineteenth cenutry.