Pearl Harbour

Discussions on History. Please keep on topic & friendly. Provocative & one sided political posts will be deleted.

Pearl Harbour

Postby Flt.Lt.Andrew » Wed Dec 07, 2005 5:21 am

Yeargh! Day of Infamy.



A.
Flt.Lt.Andrew
 

Re: Pearl Harbour

Postby ATI_7500 » Wed Dec 07, 2005 6:42 am

The idea and its execution were great, but everything afterwards was just carelessness and false beliefs.  ::)
ATI_7500
 

Re: Pearl Harbour

Postby dcunning30 » Wed Dec 07, 2005 10:20 am

Nagumo was too timid.  He should have ordered another strike to get the fuel oil tank farms and the repair facilities.  Yamamoto knew Nagumo had failed, but he had to go along with the chirade that the Pearl Harbor attack was so successful.

Also, who could have predicted it, but with the carriers out of port and not having gone after the subs proved fateful.  The American sub campaign against Japanese shipping had a huge effect on Japan's ability to wage war.  But then again, most of the Gato class subs which were tremendously effective weren't even built yet.
TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE 34 RR THE WORLD WONDERS
User avatar
dcunning30
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:34 pm
Location: The Land of Nod

Re: Pearl Harbour

Postby Flt.Lt.Andrew » Wed Dec 07, 2005 6:10 pm

Indeed. Even Stuart Braga said that too much of the Japanese campaign relied on "Japanese spirit" rather than supply lines etc.
Good ideas boys, bad execution.


A.
Flt.Lt.Andrew
 

Re: Pearl Harbour

Postby BFMF » Wed Dec 07, 2005 10:49 pm

[quote]Nagumo was too timid.
Last edited by BFMF on Wed Dec 07, 2005 10:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
BFMF
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 16266
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 6:06 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Pearl Harbour

Postby dcunning30 » Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:24 am

Indeed. Even Stuart Braga said that too much of the Japanese campaign relied on "Japanese spirit" rather than supply lines etc.
Good ideas boys, bad execution.


A.



And the Japanese never figured that out.  When American submarine doctrine called for going after Japanese merchant shipping was their highest priority, the Japanese maintained a policy of submarines going after warships as their highest priority.

Things could have been vastly different if the Japanese made it their business to go after the vulnerable allied shipping lanes in the south Pacific between Australia and the US.
TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE 34 RR THE WORLD WONDERS
User avatar
dcunning30
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:34 pm
Location: The Land of Nod

Re: Pearl Harbour

Postby H » Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:02 am

And the Japanese never figured that out... Things could have been vastly different if the Japanese made it their business to go after the vulnerable allied shipping lanes in the south Pacific between Australia and the US.
Rather strange considering their relationship with Nazi Germany. ::)
H
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5525
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:27 am
Location: NH, USA

Re: Pearl Harbour

Postby dcunning30 » Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:56 pm

Rather strange considering their relationship with Nazi Germany. ::)


Here's a link where a bunch of people smarter than me discuss Japanese submarine doctrine, tactics and construction to some detail.  The idea that Japanese sub doctrine called for them to target warships is mentioned several times.

http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/fo ... 34&ID=3504
Last edited by dcunning30 on Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE 34 RR THE WORLD WONDERS
User avatar
dcunning30
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:34 pm
Location: The Land of Nod


Return to History

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 199 guests