Page 1 of 1
Shocking bit of Indian recent history

Posted:
Mon Sep 27, 2004 7:14 am
by ozzy72
Well this is an interesting little article. Shocking, but a significant part of history nevertheless...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3684288.stm
Re: Shocking bit of Indian recent history

Posted:
Mon Sep 27, 2004 9:42 am
by ATI_7500
Interesting. What if that plan succeeded? India in german control?
Re: Shocking bit of Indian recent history

Posted:
Mon Sep 27, 2004 11:19 am
by ozzy72
It would have certainly changed things significantly in the battles of the Middle and Far East...
~

Posted:
Mon Sep 27, 2004 11:19 pm
by Scorpiоn
I doubt it... Germany was over-streched enough with three fronts, much less four.

VE Day, 1944 anyone?
Although I did hear a smattering about this a couple of years ago. Nothing to what the article states, mostly just that Germany had/was raised/raising forces to invade India. Little else was said.
Re: Shocking bit of Indian recent history

Posted:
Tue Sep 28, 2004 8:42 am
by Felix/FFDS
Suggestion:
Germany does NOT invade Russia in 1941, but decides to "help" along an Indian "rebellion.".
This posits, of course, the the rebellion in Iraq is successful, and that Vichy France retains Syria.
Presuming that an German aided "liberation" of India is quasi-successful. Plying on anti-Semitic feelings of the area, Germany succeeds in allying the area and possibly forces Britain to a tenuous "peace"
Re: Shocking bit of Indian recent history

Posted:
Tue Sep 28, 2004 12:39 pm
by Woodlouse2002
I'm thinking that the British presence in Asia would have been enough to keep an Indian uprising down. After all, they wern't fighting Japan at that point. Whats more, how could Germany have kept any of it's forces there supplied when the Royal Navy literally ruled the waves. It's all very well starting an uprising in another country but it won't get far if you don't support it after it's started.
Re: Shocking bit of Indian recent history

Posted:
Tue Sep 28, 2004 1:11 pm
by Felix/FFDS
Note that my scenario posits that the British are effectively nullified in Africa and Middle East, leaving the Alexandrian way to India. By the time of the events, the British are involved with Japan. Further scenario would have the Japanese not attacking Pearl Harbor, but concentrating on SE Asia and threatening India.
Re: Shocking bit of Indian recent history

Posted:
Tue Sep 28, 2004 1:27 pm
by Woodlouse2002
I agree with that. But any indian uprising in early 1941 would have been met by the Commonwealth troops stationed in India and very quickly by reinforcements brought in from other surrounding British territorys. Burma, Australia, Hong Kong/Singapore etc.
Though, had the armies in the Middle East and North Africa been defeated it would have mean that England would have lost her oil fields in the Middle East and so would have been brought to her knees as Germany was when the Romanian oil fields were overrun later in the war.