Hopefully soon they will go back, and hopefully they will prove without doubt that it wasnt faked. Wether that be photos or actual equipment left from all the landings thats brought back to earth or what, i dont know.
Ive read a lot on the various hoax theories, and came to the conclusion that most are widly,utterly and completly mad, most are proved wrong, and only one or two could mabye be genuine.
Ive also read, watched, and looked at loads of stuff on the Apollo programme as a whole, and Mercury, and the Gemini programmes before them. Its fascinating stuff, and i wish i could remember the name of a book i read that was as thick as two bricks that dealt with the apollo programme which was a book i couldnt put down, but i cant.
I can understand the reasoning behind faking 11, and carrying out the other missions in full, for real - i think anyway!
I still think that it happened as was broadcast though. If it was faked, other countries monitoring the final stage of the launch vehicle,(which usualy impacted with the moon, and registerd on equipment left from earlier landings in the case of later missions) and the spacecraft themselves, would have surely blown the whistle.
It would be too good for the russians NOT to proclaim the americans had faked it, imagine the scenes if they had done given the climate at the time!
Unless 11 just orbited the moon, without actualy landing. But if you go all that way, why just not the hell land?
Apollo 8 came close to the lunar surface, but had no lander, and Apollo 10's lander came within about 8 miles of the lunar surface. Why do all this then fake 11?
When Nasa do go back, hopefully we will then really know!
People Eating Tasty Animals.
....!
