Sri Lanka

Discussions on History. Please keep on topic & friendly. Provocative & one sided political posts will be deleted.

Sri Lanka

Postby Rich H » Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:18 am

Why wasn't Sri Lanka, or Ceylon then, in the British Raj of India?
Mainland India and Sri Lanka are pretty close, or was it down to the ethnic groups and religions?
Image

"Politics" is made up of two words, "Poli", which is Greek for "many", and "tics", which are blood sucking insects. - Gore Vidal
User avatar
Rich H
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2017
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:40 am
Location: Solihull, U.K.

Re: Sri Lanka

Postby H » Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:34 am

When they saw it, I guess they figured it best to "sail on..."
With that, I'd best sail on and leave this to the more informative, speculative or factual.
::)


8-)
H
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5525
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:27 am
Location: NH, USA

Re: Sri Lanka

Postby Apex » Sat Apr 03, 2010 4:01 pm

Google up "British Raj of India".  Wikipedia has an extensive and rather complex article on this. Near the top of the article, under 'Geographical extent', is this:

"Among other countries in the region, Ceylon (now Sri Lanka), was ceded to the United Kingdom in 1802 under the Treaty of Amiens. Ceylon was a British Crown Colony, but not part of British India."

There is a link to 'British Crown Colony' which sheds some light on this.  However, exactly why may not be fully answered in wikipedia, or if it is, might take some digging out, but if you're interested in this, you'll see how that area became what it is today.   
Apex
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1280
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 10:33 pm


Return to History

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 147 guests